#x27;re right that I need an acciaccatura. Thank you for
looking into it.
Hmm... the code still issues a bar check warning with an acciaccatura
or grace. It also doesn't help if I tinker with the durations:
%%%
\oneVoice \grace { c'16*1/8 d e } d8 c |
%%%
I think I unders
. How is that
supposed
to work? You probably want \acciaccatura or \grace instead.
I think you're right that I need an acciaccatura. Thank you for
looking into it.
Hmm... the code still issues a bar check warning with an acciaccatura
or grace. It also doesn't
;> to work? You probably want \acciaccatura or \grace instead.
>
>
> I think you're right that I need an acciaccatura. Thank you for looking
> into it.
>
Hmm... the code still issues a bar check warning with an acciaccatura or
grace. It also doesn't help if I tinker wit
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:15 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
> In my book, an appoggiatura is executed at least with the written
> duration, and here you take 3/16 of time from 1/8. How is that supposed
> to work? You probably want \acciaccatura or \grace instead.
I think you're right that I need
Knute Snortum writes:
> I have discovered that LilyPond 2.25.19 produces a bad bar check warning
> under certain circumstances. The three parts are 1) using two voices, 2)
> an appoggiatura, 3) using articulate.ly. Below is my example code:
>
> %%%
> \version "
I have discovered that LilyPond 2.25.19 produces a bad bar check warning
under certain circumstances. The three parts are 1) using two voices, 2)
an appoggiatura, 3) using articulate.ly. Below is my example code:
%%%
\version "2.25.19"
rightHand = \relative {
\time 3/4
<<
Hello,
yesterday I wrote about your variables, using the melody for lyrics,
for example \sopranoVoiceI instead of \verseSopranoVoiceI
\partial and rests in a Lyrics context lead to unexpectable(?) behaviour.
I came on something else, which does not affect your file, but I just
want to note it her
Hi MING TSANG,
I think, there is just a typo. You give \sopranoVoiceI as last argument
lyrics to the rehaersalMidi function. But that is the melody.
\verseSopranoVoiceI are the lyrics.
I changed that and the barcheck erros disappeared.
HTH
Jan-Peter
On 23.01.2014 16:08, MING TSANG wrote:
> 1- I
phical objects...
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `test-midi.mid'...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 2 or 3 pages...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `test-midi.ps'...
Converting to `./test-midi.pdf'...
Success: compilation successfully completed
Compl
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "MING TSANG"
Cc: "lilypond-user mailinglist"
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:15 AM
Subject: Re: bar-check warning when generating rehearsal midi soprano,
alto,tenor etc
MING TSANG writes:
Wh
MING TSANG writes:
> When compile the .ly there is no warning or error in the log file:
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.0 [test-midi.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/Tsang/Dropbox/CHOIR/the-rock/test-midi.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32]
> Preprocessing graphical objects.
Could you try to make a minimal (not) working example?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 8:45 PM, MING TSANG wrote:
> When compile the .ly there is no warning or error in the log file:
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.0 [test-midi.ly]...
> Processing `C:/Users/Tsang/Dropbox/CHOIR/the-rock/test-midi.l
When compile the .ly there is no warning or error in the log file:
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.0 [test-midi.ly]...
Processing `C:/Users/Tsang/Dropbox/CHOIR/the-rock/test-midi.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...[8][16][24][32]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Interpreting music...
MIDI out
set.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
Thanks for the feedback. I have posted it to the bugs forum
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com
I am a new user.
I get a bar check warning from this snippet (Rogers and Hart's Have You Met
Miss Jones?)
If I delete the first bar, I don't get the warning. Is this a bug, or am I
doing something wrong?
(Do I have to represent the rest somehow?)
<<
\relative c'' {
\k
-Eluze writes:
> what an inimical reply - did you report this bug!?
The original posting contains a perfectly self-contained illustrative
example. I don't see that I can improve on that. Add a subject line
like "\addlyrics misinterprets barchecks", and you are set.
--
David Kastrup
___
what an inimical reply - did you report this bug!?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Bar-check-warning-tp31176893p31179905.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing
-Eluze writes:
>> <<
>> \relative c'' {
>> \key f \major
>>| c1 | r4 d d d |
>> }
>>
>> \addlyrics {
>> | free. | And all at |
>> }
>
> i don't think you need barchecks in the lyrics since the association
> will happen automagically with \addlyrics
Huh? You _never_ "need" a barche
njrees wrote:
>
> I am a new user.
>
> I get a bar check warning from this snippet (Rogers and Hart's Have You
> Met Miss Jones?)
>
> If I delete the first bar, I don't get the warning. Is this a bug, or am I
> doing something wrong?
> (Do
19 matches
Mail list logo
