Re: Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

Thanks all, I see now how I missed explicitly instantiating the voices. If interpreted as three voices, would you consider the third voice (the double-stemmed) quarter-note value? On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:07 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Thomas Morley writes: > >> I am interpreting the upper staff

Re: Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

On 02/02/12 08:23, Hans Aikema wrote: Hi Joey, On 1-2-2012 21:45, Thomas Morley wrote: Hi Joey, 2012/2/1 Joey Di Nardo Thanks Thomas, worked like a charm.

Re: Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

Thomas Morley writes: >I am interpreting the upper staff as two voices, one with the half >note and the other with a series of eights in 7/8. > This is what I've coded for the measure (inside a relative c'): > > > > |%4 > \time 7/8 > << > \voiceOne { >

Re: Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

Hi Joey, On 1-2-2012 21:45, Thomas Morley wrote: Hi Joey, 2012/2/1 Joey Di Nardo Thanks Thomas, worked like a charm. I have another question if you don't mind. I'm t

Re: Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

Hi Joey, 2012/2/1 Joey Di Nardo : > Hi all, sorry I've been posting so much, just encountering a bunch of little > griefs that I can't find the answers to in the IR or snippets. > > My staccatos and marcatos appear under the stem when I compile using > \autochange. When I take it away, everythin

Articulations positioned under stem when using \autochange

Hi all, sorry I've been posting so much, just encountering a bunch of little griefs that I can't find the answers to in the IR or snippets. My staccatos and marcatos appear under the stem when I compile using \autochange. When I take it away, everything compiles correctly. I'm assuming this mig