2008/2/28 Kurt Kroon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
> completely reasonable, in retrospect). I've borrowed (and stretched) the
> compound-time-signature snippet as follows:
Yes, everything is possible :)
> It isn't quite right --
> (I'm not sure if one can extend this last one in LilyPond to more complex
> examples, like when the numerator is an additive expression, and the
> denominator is a single digit, e.g. (3+2+3)/8.)
I was mistaken ... it *is* possible to extend the syntax (which seems
completely reasonable, in retro
