Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-22 Thread Peter Toye
Sunday, December 22, 2019, 4:12:42 PM, Malte Meyn wrote: > Am 22.12.19 um 13:23 schrieb Peter Toye: >> I >> agree about \sp and \spp - what on earth are they meant to mean - a >> sudden quiet note in the middle of louder ones? Not a common musical >> gesture. > Maybe they mean “subito piano”

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-22 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 22.12.19 um 13:23 schrieb Peter Toye: I agree about \sp and \spp - what on earth are they meant to mean - a sudden quiet note in the middle of louder ones? Not a common musical gesture. Maybe they mean “subito piano” and “subito pianissimo”? Then they would not be for only a single not l

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-22 Thread Peter Toye
gnu.org > You can reach the person managing the list at > lilypond-user-ow...@gnu.org > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..." > Today's Topics: > 1. Re: convert-ly problems

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-21 Thread Andrew Bernard
Hi Peter, Well I have a library file with over 150 custom dynamics, for use with engraving new complexity school scores. It's a big file, with all sorts of rare dynamics. I see no need to push non-standard or rare dynamics on everybody. Just make an include file for your score and add 'rf'. One co

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-21 Thread Malte Meyn
Am 21.12.19 um 13:42 schrieb Peter Toye: May I suggest adding 'rf' to the built-in dynamics? Beethoven and Brahms used it quite a lot, even if it is synonymous with 'rfz' (pedants might disagree). As did some other, lesser, composers (one of whose music I am currently engraving). A far as

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-21 Thread Peter Toye
Saturday, December 21, 2019, 1:04:09 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Peter, >> May I suggest adding 'rf' to the built-in dynamics? Beethoven and Brahms >> used it quite a lot, even if it is synonymous with 'rfz' (pedants might >> disagree). > Is f the same as fz? f=forte, fz=forzando or sfor

Re: A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-21 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Peter, > May I suggest adding 'rf' to the built-in dynamics? Beethoven and Brahms used > it quite a lot, even if it is synonymous with 'rfz' (pedants might disagree). Is f the same as fz? > A far as I can see, it just needs adding > rfz = #(make-dynamic-script "rfz") > to dynamic-scripts-ini

A suggestion - add rf to built-in dynamics

2019-12-21 Thread Peter Toye
May I suggest adding 'rf' to the built-in dynamics? Beethoven and Brahms used it quite a lot, even if it is synonymous with 'rfz' (pedants might disagree). As did some other, lesser, composers (one of whose music I am currently engraving). A far as I can see, it just needs adding rfz = #(make