On 09.06.2010, at 15:11, Richard Sabey wrote:
Occasionally Lilypond decides to fit so many bars into a system
that notes are squeezed so tightly together that, in a beamed
group, a later note's downward stem can fall to the left of an
earlier note's upward stem. The noteheads are in the co
On 9 June 2010 18:19, Richard Sabey wrote:
> The example I gave isn't the actual music I'm trying to lay out! It is just
> a small test example crafted in order to show the effect of the bug.
Can you post a minimal example which actually shows the bug though?
If this proves too difficult, I'd be
On Wed 09 Jun 2010, 13:11 Richard Sabey wrote:
> Occasionally Lilypond decides to fit so many bars into a system that notes
> are squeezed so tightly together that, in a beamed group, a later note's
> downward stem can fall to the left of an earlier note's upward stem. The
> noteheads are in the co
>Well it seems that this is two much of sharp signs for lily to make
it fit the linewidth.
The example I gave isn't the actual music I'm trying to lay out! It is just a
small test example crafted in order to show the effect of the bug.
.
>Try to add a \bar"" at the end of your \repeat unfold th
Hi.
Well it seems that this is two much of sharp signs for lily to make it
fit the linewidth.
Try to add a \bar"" at the end of your \repeat unfold thing : \repeat
unfold 12 { \stemUp e16 fis! \change Staff = "rh" \stemDown g' fis'!
\change Staff = "lh" \bar""}
so that lily can output a cl
Occasionally Lilypond decides to fit so many bars into a system that notes are
squeezed so tightly together that, in a beamed group, a later note's downward
stem can fall to the left of an earlier note's upward stem. The noteheads are
in the correct left-to-right order but the stems are in the
