On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> Are the compile times different if you compile your score with the
>> following option set?
>>
>> \layout {
>> \context {
>>\Score
>>skipTypesetting = ##t
>> }
>> }
>
> much quicker! ... but did not work:
>
> Processing `conducteu
> Are the compile times different if you compile your score with the
> following option set?
>
> \layout {
> \context {
>\Score
>skipTypesetting = ##t
> }
> }
much quicker! ... but did not work:
Processing `conducteur.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects.
Hi Frédéric,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 07:16:07PM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> I have tested the compilation of an orchestral score I found that it
> runs much slower with 2.12.1 than with 2.10.33 on the same machine
> running Windows XP SP2 (not using the cygwin version of lilypond):
>
> 2.10.33:
I have tested the compilation of an orchestral score I found that it
runs much slower with 2.12.1 than with 2.10.33 on the same machine
running Windows XP SP2 (not using the cygwin version of lilypond):
2.10.33: 508 seconds
2.12.1: 872 seconds (+72%)
I have run the same compilation 2 times giving
