I'm still trying to dig out after a few days away from reading lilypond-user
(and have now switched to digest mode) -- sorry for the delay in response.
It seems like something is wrong with my Fink installation. After switching to
show unstable packages, I can't get the latest updates. I have a fe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello, all --
>
> Han-Wen wrote:
> >>> I suppose the distance should be increased
> >>> if the acc is before a downstem. I added a TODO.
> >>
> >> Super!
> >> (By the way, if I wanted to experiment on this, what
> >> property/settings/code would I need to modify/create?
Hello, all --
Han-Wen wrote:
I suppose the distance should be increased
if the acc is before a downstem. I added a TODO.
Super!
(By the way, if I wanted to experiment on this, what
property/settings/code would I need to modify/create?)
probably right-padding of AccidentalPlacement. (not sure)
I th
As of this afternoon, I'm running 2.1.10 on OS 10.2.8, using Fink with
the local branch enabled. It is relatively easy to do.
Stan
On Friday, January 16, 2004, at 05:30 PM, Ray McKinney wrote:
--- Kieren Richard MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ Mac OS X 10.2.8; Lilyp
--- Kieren Richard MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Mac OS X 10.2.8; Lilypond 2.1.7-3 ]
>
> Hello, all --
>
> Thanks to the patient assistance of several listers (Stan, Matthias,
> etc.), I've got 2.1.7-3 (unstable) working on my machine: I LOVE IT!
How d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > I suppose the distance should be increased
> > if the acc is before a downstem. I added a TODO.
>
> Super!
> (By the way, if I wanted to experiment on this, what
> property/settings/code would I need to modify/create?)
probably right-padding of AccidentalPlacement.
sp.
> naturals).
Oh, ok. I suppose the distance should be increased if the acc is
before a downstem. I added a TODO.
> Here are samples from 2.0.1 and 2.1.7-3; you'll see that many of the
> stems have changed by a whole staff_space or more. In particular, the
> *minimum* s
Hello, Han-Wen:
I think in both respects 2.1 looks better than 2.0.
I would agree -- that is, while neither is "optimal" (to my eye), 2.1
errs more pleasingly than 2.0... ;-)
If you like you can experiment a little for yourself,
the property that was changed is
beamed-extreme-minimum-free-len
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1. Rounded stems look great.
> 2. Spacing after bar lines is much improved.
> 3. Accidental placement on chords looks much better (n.b., I still
> think the first accidental, esp. natural, is a hair too close to the
> note column, but that's a personal preference...)
[ Mac OS X 10.2.8; Lilypond 2.1.7-3 ]
Hello, all --
Thanks to the patient assistance of several listers (Stan, Matthias,
etc.), I've got 2.1.7-3 (unstable) working on my machine: I LOVE IT!
To the development team:
1. Rounded stems look great.
2. Spacing after bar lines is much improv
10 matches
Mail list logo
