>> From: Joerg Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Likewise, you have
>> >
>> >\times 3/2 { c c } : 2 notes take time of 3; `common' tuplet
>> >
>>
>> Oh, oh! I always thought a tuplet only shortens the
>> play length. --> Next version!
Nope. For example, last night my church choir was sing
"Beton, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well known to this Window user. :-)
Window user?
> Don't forget that GPL is actually a quite restrictive licence,
[Ok, I'll bite] Yes, but the GNU GPL is only restrictive for people
that want to do Naughty Things (TM).
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Joerg Anders wrote:
"Cost free" was no juridical phrase. It describes rather the end user essense ...
(I don't know how known the GPL acronym is to Windows users.)
Well known to this Window user. :-)
Don't forget that GPL is actually a quite restrictive licence,
especially when compared to th
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Joerg Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Good. Cost free, you scared me for a moment...
"Cost free" was no juridical phrase. It describes rather the end user essense ...
(I don't know how known the GPL acronym is to Windows users.)
> Likew
rhaps no problem.(?) The problem is my limited knowledge.
> (I never was at music school). How is the real play
> time of a 2-plet computed?
As with all other tuplets, it's just the time of the notes that it
replaces. Consider
\times 2/3 { c c c } : 3 notes take time of 2; common
sical score editor NoteEdit is available:
>
> Cost free? It's GPLed, right?
Yes, is currently the same.
>
> > 3.) N-Tuplets (N in {3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10})
>
> What about N = 2?
>
Perhaps no problem.(?) The problem is my limited knowledge.
(I never was at music s
