Re: 1.5.2 Multiple voices=> Single-staff polyphony

2008-08-18 Thread David Stocker
Sure, Just let me know when you're finished with a section or part of a section and I'll have a look (just remember to state where the revisions begin and end, so as to avoid duplicate work). Thanks, Dave Valentin Villenave wrote: 2008/8/18 David Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Good job.

Re: 1.5.2 Multiple voices=> Single-staff polyphony

2008-08-18 Thread Valentin Villenave
2008/8/18 David Stocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Good job. I'm copying this to the list simply to let folks know I'm happy to > look over English documentation for correct grammar. If anyone feels that he > needs another pair of eyes to look over revisions to the documentation, then > please feel fr

1.5.2 Multiple voices=> Single-staff polyphony

2008-08-18 Thread David Stocker
Fransisco, It looks good (your English is better than my Spanish!). I have only a few suggestions: 1. In the last sentence of the paragraph following the first music example, change "voices move to avoid collisions." to "voices are automatically moved to avoid collisions." 2. In