Eluze writes:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
>> So you believe the old ("startpitch" optional) behavior will be restored
>> after
>> the testing?
>
> no idea - I've got used to the optional start pitch myself (i.e. I
> nearly never used a pitch with my laziness); I wouldn't mind if it
> came back (also in
Paul Scott writes:
> Hi,
>
> I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without startpitch.
>
> I liked the idea and started using it.
Uh, you started using it? The previous behavior of \relative { ... }
was to be equivalent to \relative c' { ... }, so you have been using
somethin
Paul Scott-4 wrote
> So you believe the old ("startpitch" optional) behavior will be restored
> after
> the testing?
no idea - I've got used to the optional start pitch myself (i.e. I nearly
never used a pitch with my laziness); I wouldn't mind if it came back (also
in the form of f' being the def
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> > startpitch.
> >
> > I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> > seems to work. I get an error.
> >
Paul Scott-4 wrote
>
> It's not mandatory in 2.17.14. It works quite well.
but in 2.17.15 it is as the links I sent explain!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/relative-in-2-17-15-tp143745p143752.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nab
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:09:24AM -0700, Eluze wrote:
> Paul Scott-4 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> > startpitch.
> >
> > I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> > seems to work. I get an error.
> >
Paul Scott-4 wrote
> Hi,
>
> I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without
> startpitch.
>
> I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
> seems to work. I get an error.
>
> What did I miss?
yes, it's mandatory to use a pitch after \relative, s
Hi,
I thought I had followed the discussion about \relative without startpitch.
I liked the idea and started using it. In 2.17.15 this feature no longer
seems to work. I get an error.
What did I miss?
Thanks,
Paul Scott
___
lilypond-user mail
