Am 15. Mai 2016 17:18:10 GMT+01:00, schrieb Paul :
>On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote:
>>> Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to
>output the result ?
>Maybe \displayLilyMusic would be usef
Le vendredi 13 mai 2016, 23:01:12 Gianmaria Lari a écrit :
> Is there any tool to "unroll" the code. For instance, suppose you have
> something like this...
> music =
> {
> \repeat unfold 3 {\fragment.1}
> \repeat unfold 2 {\fragment.1 \fragment.2}
> }
It is note possible with \repeat
Use i
That was my first thought too, but the OP wanted to have something like
\repeat unfold 3 { c d e f }
unfolded into
c d e f
c d e f
c d e f
and \displayLilyMusic doesn't do that. Instead it outputs
\repeat unfold 3 { c d e f }
Am 15/05/16 um 18:18 schrieb Paul:
On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM, Da
On 05/15/2016 09:01 AM, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the
result ?
Maybe \displayLilyMusic would be useful?
\version "2.18.2"
ab = { c d e f }
cd = { g a b c }
On Sun 15 May 2016 at 13:07:31 (+0200), imj-muz...@bluewin.ch wrote:
> Would such manipulations be easy in Scheme, using DisplayMusic to output the
> result ?
It's still rolled up:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.36
Processing `rol.ly'
Parsing...
(make-music
'SequentialMusic
'elements
(list (make-music
Greetings All,
I am by no means offering up a solution to "unroll" code, but I
certainly was intrigued by the question, because, as a composer, I
have had instances where such an ability would have been immensely
useful. When I felt fluent enough in Lily to use variables (or, for
t
. In my
> opinion this is to be considered possible only just in theory or for
> simple/short music.
> g.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/unroll-code-tp190602p190618.html
> Sent from the User mailing list ar
n my
opinion this is to be considered possible only just in theory or for
simple/short music.
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/unroll-code-tp190602p190618.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On Sat 14 May 2016 at 23:54:17 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Well, despite that I think this is an absolutely terrible hack, exporting to
> midi and importing it back produces more or less what you want, with a lot of
> editing. Works on 2.19.41 on openSUSE Leap 42.1 linux.
>
> Still interest
Well, despite that I think this is an absolutely terrible hack, exporting to
midi and importing it back produces more or less what you want, with a lot of
editing. Works on 2.19.41 on openSUSE Leap 42.1 linux.
Still interested to know why you want to do this.
Andrew
== snip
Using your input:
Hi Gianmaria,
if you use Frescobaldi, there's a "Import Midi" function in the File
Menu. In principle, if you produce a midi file from your original ly
file, you should be able to reimport the music fully unfolded.
The problem is, I've never used this function, and a quick trial just
now did
Hi Gianmaria,
On 14/05/2016, 7:01 AM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Gianmaria Lari"
wrote:
>Is there any tool to "unroll" the code. For instance, suppose you have
>something like this...
That’s a textual transformation on source code isn’t it? Therefore you would
have to do it external to lilyp
Is there any tool to "unroll" the code. For instance, suppose you have
something like this...
\version "2.19.40"
fragment.1 =
{
a b c d
}
fragment.2 =
{
e f g a
}
music =
{
\repeat unfold 3 {\fragment.1}
\repeat unfold 2 {\fragment.1 \fragment.2}
}
\score
{
\music
\layout{}
}
13 matches
Mail list logo
