Re: "loco" after ottava

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 2:14 PM Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 02/12/2022 à 02:27, Joel C. Salomon a écrit : > > Piece of music I have in front of me puts the text "loco." above the > > first note after an ottava. See also the attached example, from > >

Re: "loco" after ottava

Am Sa., 3. Dez. 2022 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra : > > Le 03/12/2022 à 15:41, Thomas Morley a écrit : > > Granted, if I use -dcheck-internal-types I mostly wear my developer > > hat. But sometimes I use it even for huge custom codings as part of > > debugging processes. > > > > Why? What d

Re: "loco" after ottava

Le 03/12/2022 à 15:41, Thomas Morley a écrit : Granted, if I use -dcheck-internal-types I mostly wear my developer hat. But sometimes I use it even for huge custom codings as part of debugging processes. Why? What does it catch? In my view, warnings about a property being set on a grob that

Re: "loco" after ottava

Am Sa., 3. Dez. 2022 um 15:06 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra : > -S only shows commits that changed the number of occurrences > of the pattern, which is useful to find out when something > was added or deleted. To find all the times a line containing > the pattern was changed, use -G instead. Thanks

Re: "loco" after ottava

Le 03/12/2022 à 14:46, Thomas Morley a écrit : I didn't know about -S Thanks. Alas, this command extended as $ git log -S "check-internal-types" --oneline --author="Han-Wen" prints for me: $ git log -S "check-internal-types" --oneline --author="Han-Wen" 264570e68e Documentation: remove documenta

Re: "loco" after ottava

Am Sa., 3. Dez. 2022 um 13:53 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra : > Le 03/12/2022 à 13:26, Thomas Morley a écrit : > > \version "2.23.0" > > > 2.23.80, I suppose? horizontal-line-spanner is new in 2.23.6. Ofcourse, that 8 slipped away somehow... > > Btw, I can't find -dcheck-internal-types in the 2.2

Re: "loco" after ottava

[Valentin] The OttavaBracket looks like a line-spanner, but it isn’t! It doesn’t even follow the spanner interface (between notes) It does ...? OttavaBracket is not an item, therefore it is a spanner. Anything with bounds is a spanner (and consequently has spanner-interface). If for exampl

Re: "loco" after ottava

Am Fr., 2. Dez. 2022 um 02:28 Uhr schrieb Joel C. Salomon : > > Piece of music I have in front of me puts the text "loco." above the > first note after an ottava. See also the attached example, from > . > > The code below does not work, which makes me s

Re: "loco" after ottava

Hi Joel, The OttavaBracket looks like a line-spanner, but it isn’t! It doesn’t even follow the spanner interface (between notes), but the bracket interface (encompass notes). But why would you in fact want this? As I read this the ottava indication and the indication are mostly independent apa

Re: "loco" after ottava

Le 02/12/2022 à 02:27, Joel C. Salomon a écrit : Piece of music I have in front of me puts the text "loco." above the first note after an ottava. See also the attached example, from . The code below does not work, which makes me suspect I do not in f

"loco" after ottava

Piece of music I have in front of me puts the text "loco." above the first note after an ottava. See also the attached example, from . The code below does not work, which makes me suspect I do not in fact understand the spanner interface. (I tried to a