exits with errors,
perhaps because of the bugs you wrote about.
--
Syepi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Output-quality-in-the-current-Lilypond-tf2807924.html#a7890810
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
output image.
Please see how it is assymetrical - ties in the middle generally tend to be
shortened, and this one is extended, and only on one side.
http://www.nabble.com/file/4621/test.png
> For the arpeggios, you can try
> \override Arpeggio #'padding = #1.0
> The default value
t; }
}
The middle tie points behind the left note. Should I send the example as a
bug report?
As of the arpeggios, could you please tell how to set its horizontal
spacing? I guess it is possible in Lilypond?
--
Syepi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Output-quality-i
se in it which i do not know?
Don't get me wrong, Lilypond is still the best notation software I know, but
I would like some more substantation from the authors. In particular, what
is up with format changes that break the old code.
-- Syepi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
nting somewhere in
th space behing noteheads to point at the heads.
By the way, the scripts from 1.6 are no more compilable, updating them with
the lilypond tool makes a lot of warnings. What for is the constant fomar
change?
--
Syepi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/O
