Since the bug probably resides in ghostscript version 9.04 vs. version
8.71, but not in Lilypond I filed a bug report to bug-ghostscript
(http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ghostscript/).
Markus
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Installed the new ghostscript version 9.04 besides the 8.71 on my
windows system and ... bingo!
The bug is not there using ghostscript 8.71 but it will show up using
the 9.04 version (which is the default for Ubuntu 11.10).
This brings up the question wether the interpretation of the 9.04
gh
Am 30.10.2011 03:30, schrieb Nick Payne:
On 30/10/11 08:22, MarkusPfaff wrote:
On my Kubuntu 11.10 system the .eps output generated from a .ly file
has ledger lines that loose their fill gradually from left to right.
You may see that in the attached example especially if you zoom in
heavily on
In the meantime I'd propose this workaround to produce at least a slightly more
readable score:
\version "2.14.1"
\relative c' { \key f \major
8(~
<
\tweak #'transparent ##t \tweak #'no-ledgers ##t a
\tweak #'transparent ##t \tweak #'no-ledgers ##t e'
bes'
\tweak
Am 21.06.2011 16:16, schrieb Janek WarchoĊ:
> 2011/6/21 Markus Pfaff:
>> A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete
>> chord.
>>
>> In my opinion this reduces readability of the score.
>> Shouldn't the slur go from the note i
Am 21.06.2011 16:16, schrieb m...@apollinemike.com:
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Markus Pfaff wrote:
>
>> A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete
>> chord.
>>
>> In my opinion this reduces readability of the score. Shouldn&#
A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete chord.
In my opinion this reduces readability of the score. Shouldn't the slur go from
the note inside of the chord wich it actually starts on to the note which it
actually ends on (from a to bes in attached example for flam
A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete chord.
In my opinion this reduces readability of the score. Shouldn't the slur go from
the note inside of the chord wich it actually starts on to the note which it
actually ends on (from a to bes in attached example for fla
A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete chord.
In my opinion this reduces readability of the score. Shouldn't the slur go from
the note inside of the chord wich it actually starts on to the note which it
actually ends on (from a to bes in attached example for flam
