On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:49:15 +0100, "Phil Burfitt"
wrote:
> Trevor, I've downloaded a number of PDF viewers for Windows and taken
> screen snapshots at 96dpi on Vista of each at 100% scaling (PNG
> attachment). Problems occur in all of them as to be expected as
> Lilyponds output is optimised for
This mailing list is about Lilypond.
What happens if you run just
the lilypond executable?
In windows you can open a CMD.EXE window on
the folder and run lilypond on the file. If the executable is not in
your %PATH%, you will have to use the full path.
Alternately, you
should be able, in Ex
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:59:32 +0100, "Phil Burfitt"
wrote:
> Lilypond _prints_ really beautiful scores, but the pdf's quality on
> screen are poor compared to the other major notation software.
Hard to believe. Please document your claim with some cropped
screenshots.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:09:38 -0700 (PDT), Antheo
wrote:
> Is there a way that the finger number and the dash could be positioned
> either above (default) or below the staff?
I use something like^\markup{\finger "-1"} for sliding
fingerings.
Replace ^ with _ to go below rather than above.
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:27:37 +0200, "Vicente Solsona"
wrote:
> To sumarise:
>
> String numbers, harmonics and right hand fingerings *must* be defined
> inside a chord construct even if there is only a single note.
>
> you can attach finger numbers to single notes:
>
> a-1 b-2 c-1-2-3-4 %
> 1.6.6 is pretty old (I'm not even sure you can download it anymore).
Google first hit:
http://lilypond.org/download/source/v1.6/
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:05:39 -0600, Carl Sorensen
wrote:
> On 9/13/10 7:47 AM, "Phil Holmes" wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Nick Payne"
>> To:
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: Chords with unequal durations
>>
>>
>>> One problem with turning off
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:40:48 -0700 (PDT), Jebus
wrote:
> I've searched, and searched and read many lilypond documents, but I just
> can't for the life of me figure out how to accomplish the following
> notation:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p29685494/Screenshot.png
That just looks like two v
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:10:59 -0700, David Rogers
wrote:
> * Graham Percival [2010-09-06 11:33]:
>
>>We're not going to change anything, and I don't know why people keep
>>on talking about changing the mailing list.
>
> They do it because the vast majority of mailing lists to which they
> subscr
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:36:31 -0700, Michael
wrote:
> When trying to register for the LSR, Firefox gave be the "This
> Connection is Untrusted" warning, trying to connect to
> "lsr.dsu.unimi.it". Is this supposed to be this way, or is the
> connection a regular unsecure one? Would it be fine to ad
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:22:35 -0400, Brett McCoy
wrote:
> I like to scan emails in my inbox by subject, too, and it's nice to
> see what is there (LAU, Ardour-user, etc). I use gmail so everything
> isn't automatically moved to a folder.
gmail problems should be solved by gmail. You can't expect t
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:12:03 +0200, Alexander Kobel
wrote:
> On 2010-09-05 19:55, Marc Schonbrun wrote:
>> On Sep 5, 2010, at 10:52 AM, PMA wrote:
>>> Hi List.
>>>
>>> Would it be feasible to prepend "[Lilypond]" to the forum's email Subject
>>> line?
>>> Much of my other mail arrives this way -
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:52:54 -0400, PMA
wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Would it be feasible to prepend "[Lilypond]" to the forum's email
> Subject line?
This is ugly and unnecessary.
It also won't work if someone, rather than replying, originates a
new e-mail which is CC'd to you and the mailing list,
Maybe it's because you've put in a decrescendo, which is not followed
by any other dynamics to restore the volume!
Try adding, say, mf for
mezzo-forte after the decrescendo.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 06:00:30 -0700
(PDT), MING TSANG wrote:
Kaz: I think there is a problem for "c2>
d!" construct
On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:43:23 +0200, Helge Kruse
wrote:
> Am 02.09.2010 21:24, schrieb David Raleigh Arnold:
>> Run this command:
>> $ rowil 112351324511235167859
>> On this line, selected:
>> c4 d4 e4 g,4 | Now is the time
>
> What is the meaning of this magical number: 112351324511235167859 ?
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT), MING TSANG wrote:
>Additional info pertain to #1 below.
Also, is there anything in the .log file?
If LilyPond is doing something unexpected, always check
for any diagnostics.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT), MING TSANG wrote:
>Additional info pertain to #1 below.
>
>On bar 15 I remove " ^markup{rit.}^\> \! " from the .ly file and re-run
>lilypond. The generated midi now can play bass staff till the end .
\> begins a crescendo terminated by \!
But you have
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:59:23 +1000, John Zaitseff
wrote:
> A very quick and simple question that has me stumped: How do I enter the
> chord "B(add4)/G#" in LilyPond's chord mode? I am trying to transcribe
> that very chord in a song we have...
>
> I am quite adept at using LilyPond, but my kno
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 23:10:42 -0500, Christopher Meredith
wrote:
> Usually, a chord with an added fourth is notated "B11." So you'd want
> b:11/gis
That's a dominant chord: 1-3-5-b7-9-11 degrees.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
htt
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:22:07 +0200, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Maybe another, non-technical, viewpoint.
> I think that, out of respect for those people who are on the list, someone
> who intends to ask for help from them, should have made the (little) effort
> of subscribing.
Hi Gilles,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 06:58:49 +0200, Jan Kohnert
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 01 September 2010, 06:20:06 schrieben Sie:
^^
This is broken; in a group discussion, surely this should be:
"Kaz Kylheku shriebt:".
Also, why did you put bo
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:19:56 +0200, Jan Kohnert
wrote:
> David Rogers schrieb:
>> * Jan Kohnert [2010-08-31 06:22]:
>> >David Rogers schrieb:
>> >> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
>> >> >Tim McNamara writes:
>> >> >> Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the maili
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:40:27 -0700, David Rogers
wrote:
> * Michael Welsh Duggan [2010-08-30 18:04]:
>>Yes, there is a reason.
>>
>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>>http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt
>
>
> The logic at those links is impeccable but irrelevant. The
Hi all,
Firstly, I have a question. Is the \prallup ornament supposed to be
the same thing
as a Baroque style trill with termination?
That is to say, exemplified by a transformation like
{d4 \prallup c} -> {e32 d e d e d c d c4}.
The notation looks very similar.
Secondly, does anyone have a
24 matches
Mail list logo
