gt;> }
>>
\new Staff = basses <<
\clef bass
\new Voice = "three" { \voiceOne << \baritone >> }
\new Voice = "four"{ \voiceTwo << \bass >> }
>>
>>
\layout { }
}
Regards,
Jason Merrill
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
y, but I don't know what to do about it. Any
suggestions?
Regards,
Jason Merrill
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
There is not now, nor ever will be, some universal music language.
MusicXML is an option, but not one everybody will choose. One could ask
the exact same question by replacing 'lilypond' with 'MusicXML'. The
issue with archival (it seems to me) is a format whose source will
"always" be readable
Downsides are that
it is proprietary and not free, and takes what seems to me a rather
indirect route towards solving my particular problem.
Any other suggestions? Any comments on the likelihood of being able
to compile lilypond into a music interchange format at some point in
the future?
Regar
on this problem. Am I wrong in thinking
that lilypond files aren't really archival? Is there some solution I
haven't thought of?
Regards,
Jason Merrill
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Is there any lilypond analog to latexit:
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/math_science/latexit.html
Googling
lilypondit
and
lilypond latexit
didn't yield anything too promising. For longer documents,
lilypond-book looks like it would be fantastic, but if I want to throw
one or two quick
I'm looking for a good way to write intermittent lyrics for a choral
part. I'm working on a piece with a repetitive bass figure, so after
the first repetition, there is no need to keep writing out the words.
However, I'd like to write more words at the beginning of the next
section.
An obvious w
