My score is coming along nicely. But I am not satisfied with the
positioning of the rests in the upper voice. Here is an example. The
placement of the dotted half rest here just looks too high to me. How
can I move it so that it is lower?
% measure 16:
<<
{ r2.^\markup { \bold \
Nick Payne wrote:
\override Fingering #'staff-padding = #'() % vertical
fingering inside the staff
\override StringNumber #'staff-padding = #'() % vertical
string numbers inside the staff
\override StrokeFinger #'staff-padding = #'() % vertical
stroke fingering inside t
Ok, I'm getting the hang of things a little better now.
Here's a tricky measure I'm working on. It has left hand fingerings and
a string number. I don't quite understand the behavior of the string
number. If I designate right or left, it goes next to the note and on
the staff. But if I put
See the thread I started a couple of days ago: Lilypond vs. Score.
A commercial publisher that I talked with claims that there is no
product currently available which can produce the same quality of output
as the Score software.
Michael J. O'Donnell wrote:
I am pondering offering engraving serv
hich are not within a chord construct. That is, if
you want a single note fingering to go left (or right or down), you'll
have to put it into chord braces -- 4 rather than b4-1 (that
trips up a lot of new users when they start modifying fingering
placements).
Have fun,
David
Bobber wro
I would like to have more control over where string numbers, left hand
fingerings and right hand fingers are placed. I mean putting them below
a note, to the side or above. Is this possible?
--
Bob Wooldridge
Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/
___
li
David Stocker wrote:
Greetings.
Your example works as is in 2.13.11, with the string number
indications appearing above the beams of the notes.
I'm using the 2.12 stable branch. Is 2.13.11 mostly usable?
--
Bob Wooldridge
Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/
_
I'm engraving some guitar music. It's polyphonic on one staff. In one
measure I am indicating string numbers. The numbers are colliding with
the upper voice. Here's the measure where it's happening:
% measure 20:
<<
{ r8 8 8 c'8 e'4 } \\
{ c2. }
>>
The eight n
On 02/02/2010 04:15 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
As far as I'm concerned: LilyPond is Free Software, Score is not. Period.
Yes, I agree. However, one of the claims made in the discussion was
that publishers can work with a Finale file and convert it to work with
Score but this is not poss
Graham Percival wrote:
Score can do stuff like having the staves in a spiral. Think of
George Crumb -- if he used any computer engraver, it would be
score. Score is also not free: it's not open source, and IIRC it
costs $500 or more.
I only saw it briefly a few years ago. I think our fonts ar
I have been having a discussion with a small publisher who uses the
music manuscript program called Score. He says that neither Lilypond or
Finale can produce engraving that is comparable to Score. And that most
of the major music publishers in the world use Score.
Is anyone familiar with Sc
11 matches
Mail list logo
