Hi David,
It sure does!!
With Lilypond 2.16.1 it is almost(!) at the outer right side of the staff,
there is still a little bit of staff visible after the final barline.
Please ignore my ignorance but can I add a value 0.5 or 1.0 somewhere in
your code to nudge it a little to the right?
_
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes:
>
Below a MWE of what I am trying to achieve (mind the wordwrap)
I hope someone has a solution to automatically place it at the end
of the staff, irrespective of the width of the staff.
I'd like to have the last barline exactly at the end of the last sta
Can this be automatically (and correctly)?
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Benjamin,
Have a look at the followining message:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/60967
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
n,
A frightfull idea when typesetting a complete Bach cantata, or,
as is the case, a complete orchestral score (not very large happily)
I stick with the use of \set Timing.beamExceptions = #'( (end . ( ( (1 . 8) . (2
2 2) ) ) ) ) for now. Pity I hav
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes:
> I've found some info in ‘scm/time-signature-settings.scm'
> ;; in 3 4 time:
> ;; use defaults, but combine all beats into a unit if possible
> ;;
> ;; set all beams to end on beats, but 1 8 to beam entire measure
;; triplets back to every beat.
((3 . 4) .
((beamExceptions . ((end . (((1 . 8) . (6))
((1 . 12) . (3 3 3
Now I have to figure out to counteract this exception ('but 1 8 to beam entire
measure') since this is defina
is8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\> ( ais8\! ) Pondly,Ralph|
Hi Ralph,
Thanks for your reply, but trust me, the measures are complete (you've
overlooked the dot after a8. <-dot
> e8 ( d8 ) cis8\> ( b8 ) a8. ( g16\! ) % <-correct beaming
> fis8 ( e8 ) a8 ( a8 ) b8\>
woTwoVoiceOne }
I hope someone can point me in the right direction, it is driving me
desperate!
Thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
you some examples if you like, just let me know.
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
L.S.
After every update of lilypond I have to make an adjustment to the size
of the accidentals in the figured bass 'function'.
The sharp and natural are very small and therefore hardly distinguishable;
small, especially if you compare it to the size of the figures:-(
To achieve this I adapt
.\us
ilypond, impressed as
I am about the quality of the output, convinced as I am about it's
architecture/design and having confidence in the support and development of
Lilypond.
Regards,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
> New lilypond user, finally got rid of finale (thank god). My question is kind
of dumb but I'm really confused about this.
>
> I have a large ensemble score finished (Brass Choir, Organ and Chorus) and I
need to extract parts from this (can you tell I was a finale user for 7 years?)
Did I create
>Federico Bruni gmx.com> writes:
>
> interesting!
> other info here:
> http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes
>
And with the experimental feature 'Embed PDF & EPS files' while saving to
pdf Scribus produces razor-sharp (and tiny) pdf-files.
Absolutely fabulous!
___
1 generated an error if I choose 'only for me'
I re-installed OOoLilyPond_0.3.3.oxt and let OOoLilyPond-0.4.0.oxt do the
removing.
Now it works!
Thanks again.
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu
Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm running into several problems with figured bass while writing another
> large orchestral piece. Attached is a sample file highlighting these issues:
>
And while we're at it, is it possible to enlarge the figured bass?
The figures are
Samuel Hartmann gmail.com> writes:
> The next version of OOoLilyPond is almost finished now. Before the
> official release I would like to have some users testing it. You can
> download the release candidate from:
> http://www.hartmann-weine.ch/OOoLilyPond-0.4rc1.oxt
>
Tested in OO 3.1.0 (OOO31
Grammostola Rosea gmail.com> writes:
> >
> Ik kan me niet registreren... krijg geen email...
>
Check even je 'spam-box', bij mij verdween hij linea-recta in de spam.
AWRog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.or
Repository and incorporated into the Lilypond manuals
immediately!
Beautiful examples to incorporate into a show-case and to convince (so-called)
professional printers to accept lilypond-scores (try to typeset this Reubke with
Finale/Sibelius!)
Arno Rog
__
Arno Rog gmail.com> writes:
>
> Fresh install of lilypond-2.10.33-1.mingw.exe on WinXP.
>
> \compressFullBarRests generates error: unknown escaped string:
> `\compressFullBarRests'
Sorry, please disregard!
Downloaded inadvertently the old branch :-( instead of 2
L.S.
Fresh install of lilypond-2.10.33-1.mingw.exe on WinXP.
\compressFullBarRests generates error: unknown escaped string:
`\compressFullBarRests'
AWRog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
ly!
There is a problem though when using \relative mode:
\relative c'' {
c g c g | %1
g' b, \rest f g | %2
}
When I change b, \rest to r4 it produces another result because of the use of
\relative!
\relative c'' {
c g c g | %1
g' r4 f g | %2
}
ike to stick to using \relative notation.
Thanks in advance.
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
;
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
Daniel,
An example would help.
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
L.S.
or a large orchestral score I need to repeat the short instrument names on all
but the first page. They print fine, but I need some more space to print.
Unfortunately, it looks like short-indent
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/user/lilypond/Instrument-names#Instrument-names)
doe
>
> So, figured bass experts, here's your opportunity to chime in:
>
> 1. Do you want the accidental size increased?
>
> 2. Do you want the figure number font changed?
>
> Carl
>
Carl,
Amazing:
1. Yes please increase the accidental size ( 0 0 ), seems fine to
ay I suggest a new default value of 0 (zero).
The present value is really too small in comparison to the numbers (and to
read).
Is there a place where I can make such a siggestion for the upcoming release?
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
L.S.,
Is there a way to enlarge the accidentals in a figured bass,
leaving the size of the numbers unchanged?
Thanks in advance
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Graham Percival gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'm happy to announce that NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments is ready
> for the first public review! Thanks to Andrew for writing and
> Carl for reviewing this section.
>
> Please proofread it carefully; let us know about any mistakes or
> omissions. As alway
ll include several (sets of) includes, luckily the missing includes
are ignored, causes large log-files though ;-)
Is there a way to speed up the realization of this?
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
ut using hardcoded path's?
Thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> Arno,
>
> The good news is, yes it can be done, and quite simply. You simply need
> to set Staff.ignoreFiguredBassRest = ##f.
>
Carl,
You're a genius (or quite close to it)
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypo
matically:
r g a b
---
It can also happen that for example a sharp is printed below the rest, and a
line below the notes.
schematically
r g a b
#--
Can this be done in above piece of code?
Hope to hear from you an d thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
Reinhold Kainhofer kainhofer.com> writes:
>
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 schrieb Arno Rog:
> > Problem is that using the Staff context the figures/symbols are way to low
> > beneath the notes (it looks like they belong to the notes on the staff
> > below)
>
&g
e this has been
mentioned before, but I'm unable to find a solution/workaround?
Is there a solution?
Thanks in advance,
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
layLilyMusic did the trick.
Is there also a command to convert the implicit notelengths into full notation.
e.g. r8 d d e f d16 e f8 g -> r8 d8 d8 e8 f8 d16 e16 f8 g8
Thanks in advance
Arno Rog
p.s. a more complex question: is there a way to perform an action (e.g.
transpose) on notes
L.S.
Is there a way (script/program) to convert a 'relative' lilypond score into an
absolute notation?
Using lilypond 2.11.48 on WinXP
Thanks in advance
Arno Rog
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
37 matches
Mail list logo
