Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread David Wright
On Tue 25 Feb 2025 at 13:41:58 (+0100), Gianmaria Lari wrote: > The implicit instantiation of items is something almost always creating > problems for me. I agree that without it, the code would be very verbose > even for very simple situations but in the end, I have the impression that > it does

Re: Other-hand bracket/thumbBracket (piano notation) broken?

2025-02-25 Thread Thomas Ruedas
Am 25.02.25 um 14:32 schrieb Robin Bannister: Thomas Ruedas wrote: for many years I have used a hack for marking a change of hand in polyphonic piano music that I had been pointed to some 11 years ago on this group, and it had worked fine. Unfortunately, no more. I updated this to the attached

Re: Other-hand bracket/thumbBracket (piano notation) broken?

2025-02-25 Thread Robin Bannister
Thomas Ruedas wrote: Hi, for many years I have used a hack for marking a change of hand in polyphonic piano music that I had been pointed to some 11 years ago on this group, and it had worked fine. Unfortunately, no more. I updated this to the attached version about a year ago. It runs with 2

Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread Gianmaria Lari
> > > > *If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you > propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'. > > That's the contrary. If you instantiate the first Voice (directly after > the \new Staff command, not after <<, maybe I was not clear enough in my > previou

Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 12:48, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > *If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'. That's the contrary. If you instantiate the first Voice (directly after the \new Staff command, not after <<, ma

Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread Gianmaria Lari
[...] > You are not explicitly instantiating the first voice. > Replace \new Staff by \new Staff \new Voice and you have the expected > output. > *If* I understood correctly, if I instantiate the first voice as you propose the voice will go in a different context then 'd4'. This can be ok or not

Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 11:14, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > > I did some tests and I discovered something that's not clear. > > Why in the following code the very last note `d4` stem is up? > > %%% > \version "2.25.23" > \fixed c' \new Staff > { > %a1 > << > {\voiceTwo a,4 d g c' } > \new Vo

Re: temporary polyphonic passage

2025-02-25 Thread Gianmaria Lari
I did some tests and I discovered something that's not clear. Why in the following code the very last note `d4` stem is up? %%% \version "2.25.23" \fixed c' \new Staff { %a1 << {\voiceTwo a,4 d g c' } \new Voice {\voiceOne r1 } >> d4 % stem up } %%% I didn't call \oneVoice so I