P.S. After hitting “send,” it occurred to me that the code I sent would not
account music after a new system starts. The clef would appear incorrectly
placed. I amended the code as below, and in this version, I tweaked the Scheme
code setting so that the two clefs would not collide in the new sy
> Is there any possibility of doing something like this picture below? On top
> is lilypond's default output and on the bottom is what I seek to write.
>
Dear Lucas,
Referring to the following pages on LilyPond Documentation:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/modifying-sing
Am Sonntag, dem 29.12.2024 um 20:51 + schrieb Timothy Lanfear:
>
> On 29/12/2024 18:28, Andreas K. H. von Rüden wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Is there any way i can achieve this in version 2.24?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
>
> Running convert-ly gives a clue:
>
> Not smar
On 29/12/2024 18:28, Andreas K. H. von Rüden wrote:
Is there any way i can achieve this in version 2.24?
Thanks in advance.
Andreas
Running convert-ly gives a clue:
Not smart enough to convert \consists Mark_engraver. If independent mark
sequences are desired, use multiple Mark_tracking_tra
Hi all,
for a special purpose i need two independent rehearsal marks in
different voices. In version 2.22.1 i used the following example
successfully:
\version "2.22.1"
StimmeA = \relative {
\mark #1
c''1
c1
\mark \default
c1
}
StimmeB = \relative {
s1
\mark #1
s1
s1
}
\score
Would it work to run in the global scope the same function that initializes
the units within output-def modules?
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024, 11:38 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> Timothy Lanfear writes:
>
> > On 29/12/2024 12:57, Richard Shann wrote:
> >> Is there a way of writing
> >>
> >> \override #'(li
Timothy Lanfear writes:
> On 29/12/2024 12:57, Richard Shann wrote:
>> Is there a way of writing
>>
>> \override #'(line-width . 100)
>>
>> so that the value is interpreted as mm rather than staff-spacings?
>>
>> Richard
>>
> Recent 2.25 releases have the scheme function to-staff-space,
> Otherwi
On 29/12/2024 12:57, Richard Shann wrote:
Is there a way of writing
\override #'(line-width . 100)
so that the value is interpreted as mm rather than staff-spacings?
Richard
Recent 2.25 releases have the scheme function to-staff-space, Otherwise
you can get the conversion factor from the pap
Is there a way of writing
\override #'(line-width . 100)
so that the value is interpreted as mm rather than staff-spacings?
Richard
On 12/28/24 04:06, Yoshiaki Onishi wrote:
https://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=861
Thank you, it works nicely.
Best Regards,
Alexander
10 matches
Mail list logo
