Paolo Prete writes:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Paolo Prete writes:
>>
>>
>> Still scheme? instead of markup?
>>
>> Still a scheme function instead of a markup command.
>>
>> > #{
>> > \markup \
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:07 PM David Kastrup wrote:
> Paolo Prete writes:
>
>
> Still scheme? instead of markup?
>
> Still a scheme function instead of a markup command.
>
> > #{
> > \markup \with-dimensions #'(0 . 0)
> #'(0
>
Hi Damian,
> use case is borderline, agreed
I don’t believe that to be true! Here are two classic counterexamples:
1. When dealing with eighth notes, I regularly have to
\omit Flag
\omit Stem
\omit Beam
etc.
In certain situations, other mechanisms are more appropriate (e.g., u
> Thanks again!
> I hope Damian appreciates your response as much as I do. :)
>
>
Certainly do, really helpful
use case is borderline, agreed, but I do sometimes need 3 or 4 simultaneous
\omits in this very rhythmically complex score.
I was just as interested in the mechanics of a solution
>
> % This uses the suffix and pays attention to the internal
> % \paper block
> \book {
> \bookOutputSuffix "Three"
> \sc
> \paper { annotate-spacing = ##t }
> }
>
> \paper { annotate-spacing = ##t }
---
Hi David,
Thanks for the fishing lesson!
> How about
>
> omitt =
> #(define-music-function (groblist) (symbol-list?)
> #{ #@(map omit (map list groblist)) #})
>
> \void \displayLilyMusic \omitt TimeSignature,NoteHead
AH!
symbol-list? is clearly something I needed to know [about]…
> You need
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi Damian,
>
>> how would I reduce e.g.
>>
>> \once \omit TupletBracket
>> \once \omit TupletNumber
>> \once \omit Stem
>>
>> to a structure conceptually like:
>>
>> \once \omit (TupletBracket, TupletNumber, Stem)
>>
>> i.e. put the grobs in a list
>
> Maybe somet
Hi Damian,
> how would I reduce e.g.
>
> \once \omit TupletBracket
> \once \omit TupletNumber
> \once \omit Stem
>
> to a structure conceptually like:
>
> \once \omit (TupletBracket, TupletNumber, Stem)
>
> i.e. put the grobs in a list
Maybe something like this (but something that actually
Sebastian Menge writes:
> I used an "\outline" consisting of silence and the time signatures and
> marks and put it in parallel inside the staff but then the layout gets
> wrong, because the "silence" somehow influences the layout algorithm. (see
> below)
It doesn't.
> Is there a more clever wa
Paolo Prete writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:56 PM David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Paolo Prete writes:
>>>
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Given:
>>> >
>>> > floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
>>> > (number? number? scheme?)
>>> > #{
>
Hi
I am writing arrangements for accordion and create the score and the
individual voices using \book.
To save effort and give some structure / consistency I want to reuse
certain things like
- time signatures
- \marks
I used an "\outline" consisting of silence and the time signatures and
marks
I see but the problem remains. I would like to found a way to pass a more
structured object to that function, not only a string:
%%
\version "2.24.1"
floating-markup = #(define-scheme-function (parser location x y obj)
(number? number? scheme?)
#{
Hi all how would I reduce e.g. \once \omit TupletBracket \once \omit
TupletNumber \once \omit Stem to a structure conceptually like: \once \omit
(TupletBracket, TupletNumber, Stem) i.e. put the grobs in a list thanks Damian
13 matches
Mail list logo
