On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 08:11, Jeff Olson wrote:
>
> Thanks, David!
>
> That works even for the case where there is no explicit Staff (just a
bare TabStaff). Excellent!
>
> But I still had to remove my \tabFullNotation command to avoid an
implicit TabStaff.
>
> Is there an alternative place (outsi
On 6/25/2024 11:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Have you tried just writing \set Staff.minimumFret instead? TabStaff
listens to the alias Staff as well as its germane TabStaff.
Thanks, David!
That works even for the case where there is no explicit Staff (just a
bare TabStaff). Excellent!
But
[Sorry! I wrote this two days ago on a train in one of the famous German
cell connection dead zones - and then forgot to actually send it later.]
Hi Kieren,
The last "m" in your innermost (if ...) is unnecessary: As with the difference between "for" and
"map" in plain Scheme, the return value
Jeff Olson writes:
> Sometimes guitarists want the same piece two ways: with an added
> TabStaff while learning and without the TabStaff when performing (for
> brevity). But the code needed to tailor the tab generation also
> screws up the notation when you don't want tab.
>
> My music code has
Sometimes guitarists want the same piece two ways: with an added
TabStaff while learning and without the TabStaff when performing (for
brevity). But the code needed to tailor the tab generation also screws
up the notation when you don't want tab.
My music code has extensive use of "\set TabSt
Hi Alex,
> is there any way to recreate the attached situation in "pure" LilyPond?
Do you mean other than three markups with scores in them?
> What I'm after is a startStaff on steroids that can reinstantiate an entire
> ChoirStaff or GrandStaff, including the brace or bracket.
Yeah, Someone™
Hi Fennel,
> I wonder if this is hackable if I just duplicate the current staff context as
> a dynamic context and then remove all of the markup objects from the staff
> context…
I wouldn’t call that “hacking”… that’s simply using contexts to display
different grobs.
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\vers
Dear all,
is there any way to recreate the attached situation in "pure" LilyPond?
What I'm after is a startStaff on steroids that can reinstantiate an entire
ChoirStaff or GrandStaff, including the brace or bracket. I've mostly seen this
in dense D.S. al coda situations, but also in certain othe
Hi Fennel,
> I’d like to adjust the size of certain script marks like trills and bowings
> relative to the staff size. The script class doesn’t seem to let you change
> the symbol’s size.
Of course it does! If you look at the bottom of that page, you’ll see that
Script inherits many interfaces
> Knute, to your point I think that the Dynamics context, while
> slightly better than lyricMode for this use case still has a similar
> issue given that the project I'm working on is of considerable size
> and would require a significant refactor. Feasible but I'd like to
> avoid doing this if at
Fennel,
I am not converse in “hacking” so I suggest you attempt it.
Mark
From: Fennel
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 10:31 AM
To: carsonm...@ca.rr.com
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: RE: Vertically align objects of same class?
I wonder if this is hackable if I just duplicate the
I’d like to adjust the size of certain script marks like trills and bowings
relative to the staff size. The
[script](https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/internals/script) class
doesn’t seem to let you change the symbol’s size.
~Fennel
I wonder if this is hackable if I just duplicate the current staff context as a
dynamic context and then remove all of the markup objects from the staff
context…
~Fennel
On Tuesday, June 25th, 2024 at 12:52 PM, carsonm...@ca.rr.com
wrote:
> Fennel,
>
> Go to:
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.
Fennel,
Go to:
https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.24/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#dynamics
And scroll down to “A dynamics context”.
Mark
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
On Behalf Of Fennel
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 9:06 AM
To: Lilypon
Knute, to your point I think that the Dynamics context, while slightly better
than lyricMode for this use case still has a similar issue given that the
project I'm working on is of considerable size and would require a significant
refactor. Feasible but I'd like to avoid doing this if at all pos
> I have a bunch of objects of the same type that I’d like to all be
> aligned to the same Y-level on a per staff basis.
Increase the `staff-padding` property.
Werner
Thanks. As far as the "fork" style is concerned, Aaron, your example is great!
Learning a lot :)
It seems like it would be great if the stencil that you've made could be
wrapped into the style property, as that's what Lilypond seems to want the
user-settable property. The [documentation
page](
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 9:07 AM Fennel wrote:
> I have a bunch of objects of the same type that I’d like to all be aligned
> to the same Y-level on a per staff basis
>
I would use a Dynamics context for this, but perhaps that's what you meant
when you said you didn't want to use lyricsMode.
%%%
I have a bunch of objects of the same type that I’d like to all be aligned to
the same Y-level on a per staff basis.
Here’s an example:
\version "2.24.3"
\relative c'' {
c_"I" c'_"II" c,,_"III" c'_"IV"\break
g_"A" g'_"B" g,,_"C" g'_"D"
}
I would like for all of the markup objects on each staff
19 matches
Mail list logo
