Re: Strange text distribution

2021-11-16 Thread Phil Holmes
See melismaBusyProperties in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-vocal-music#multiple-notes-to-one-syllable On 13/11/2021 13:54, Bernhard Kleine wrote: Hi, I feel lost. The text should go to every note in the example. However the brackets behave as slurs /t

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 16/11/2021 à 20:55, Lukas-Fabian Moser a écrit : Another option is to treat the piece as a cadenza.  Just know that you will need to manually insert \bar "" in places to permit line breaks. Or use barAlways and defaultBarType: \version "2.22" \layout {   \cadenzaOn   \set Timing.barA

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Lukas-Fabian Moser
Another option is to treat the piece as a cadenza.  Just know that you will need to manually insert \bar "" in places to permit line breaks. Or use barAlways and defaultBarType: \version "2.22" \layout {   \cadenzaOn   \set Timing.barAlways = ##t   \set Timing.defaultBarType = "" } \rel

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-11-16 11:37 am, Jean Abou Samra wrote: Or use this: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2021-01/msg00058.html That's clever. :) -- Aaron Hill

Re: articulate

2021-11-16 Thread Knute Snortum
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:37 AM Ken & Thu Huong wrote: > > Hello, LilyPond friends, > > We are new to this game... hope we're doing things right here? ...but in any > case, we have a problem. > > Attached please find these minimal – ! – files: > > (1) source / pdf / mid without using articul

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le 16/11/2021 à 20:31, Aaron Hill a écrit : On 2021-11-16 11:13 am, E Appeldoorn wrote: Thanks Aaron My question appears to be incompleet. The piece does need a final barline \bar "|." \remove the "bar_engraver" through the staff context seems to make that impossible. (Be sure to keep lily

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-11-16 11:13 am, E Appeldoorn wrote: Thanks Aaron My question appears to be incompleet. The piece does need a final barline \bar "|." \remove the "bar_engraver" through the staff context seems to make that impossible. (Be sure to keep lilypond-user@gnu.org on the TO: or CC: for visi

\omit Staff.Barline (second installment)

2021-11-16 Thread E Appeldoorn
In a score that has no barlines I have used \omit Staff.BarLine Which indeed leaves out the barlines. But the space and padding, which the barline would normally use, remain. %% \version "2.22.1" \fixed c { \time 4\4 \omit Staff.BarLine a4 a a a | b b b b } %% Would give a very visible differenc

Re: \omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2021-11-16 10:46 am, E Appeldoorn wrote: In a score that has no barlines I have used \omit Staff.BarLine Which indeed leaves out the barlines. But the space and padding, which the barline would normally use, remain. %% \version "2.22.1" \fixed c { \time 4\4 \omit Staff.BarLine a4 a a a | b b

\omit Staff.BarLine

2021-11-16 Thread E Appeldoorn
In a score that has no barlines I have used \omit Staff.BarLine Which indeed leaves out the barlines. But the space and padding, which the barline would normally use, remain. %% \version "2.22.1" \fixed c { \time 4\4 \omit Staff.BarLine a4 a a a | b b b b } %% Would give a very visible differ

articulate

2021-11-16 Thread Ken & Thu Huong
Hello, LilyPond friends, We are new to this game... hope we're doing things righthere? ...but in any case, we have a problem. Attached please find these minimal – ! – files:     (1) source / pdf/ mid without using articulate     (2) source / pdf/ mid with using articulate Note the pdf / mid ou

Re: Stems question

2021-11-16 Thread Jacques Menu
> Le 16 nov. 2021 à 11:44, Павел a écrit : > > Sorry, my mistake: > > \relative c' { \stemDown c8[ d] \stemUp e[ e'] } > > 16.11.2021 13:41, Павел пишет: >> Hello, Jacques Menu! >> >> Since you did not specify the time signature, lilypond chose the default one >> — 4/4. In this signature,

Re: Stems question

2021-11-16 Thread Павел
Sorry, my mistake: \relative c' { \stemDown c8[ d] \stemUp e[  e'] } 16.11.2021 13:41, Павел пишет: Hello, Jacques Menu! Since you did not specify the time signature, lilypond chose the default one — 4/4. In this signature, lilypond groups 1/8-notes by four. You can explicitly override it:

Re: Stems question

2021-11-16 Thread Павел
Hello, Jacques Menu! Since you did not specify the time signature, lilypond chose the default one — 4/4. In this signature, lilypond groups 1/8-notes by four. You can explicitly override it: \relative c'[ { \stemDown c8] d \stemUp e[  e'] } For additional information you can read the documen

Stems question

2021-11-16 Thread Jacques Menu
Hello folks, With this input: %% \version "2.22.1" \relative c' { \stemDown c8 d \stemUp e e' } %% I get this output: Any help is welcome! JM