On 2020-11-15 12:03 pm, Tom Brennan wrote:
I'd like to create a function that would allow me to create a
`bookpart`
from a list of arguments. E.g.,
[...]
Is this kind of thing possible?
Yes-ish, see my post [1] last month about "returning" books and book
parts.
[1]:
https://lists.gnu.org
> "Knute" == Knute Snortum writes:
Knute> Here's another way that "articulate.ly" messes with bar line
Knute> checks. If you put a \repeat volta in the middle of a measure,
Knute> you cannot get reliable bar line checks (|) after that. Here's
Knute> my MWE:
That's a problem with the music.
Close or not close. I'm the major audience, so all that matters is do I
like it! That said, I'm a 'serif' kinda guy, so I'd have to agree to
disagree about Helvetica ;)
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 8:36 PM David Rogers
wrote:
> "Hugh S. Myers" writes:
>
> > I've been working on a very small piece of
Hi folks-
Can you help me get these figures lined up vertically? The below example is
as close as I've gotten, but I want the 8 in the 2nd figure to be visible.
It seems that setting implicitBassFigures within a continuation line
doesn't work.
%%% example start
\version "2.21.80"
\new Staff {
I'd like to create a function that would allow me to create a `bookpart`
from a list of arguments. E.g.,
```lilypond
\book {
\custom_bookpart "horn" \hn_movt_one \hn_movt_two
}
```
The reason is because I'd like to reuse header and page info, etc, without
having to repeat those common variable na
Good morning, well at least in my part of the world...
I am using 2.21.80 for a while and until now I have no issues to report. So far
everything is working well.
My system is:
desktop: Ubuntu Studio 20.10 (AMD processor)
laptops: Kubuntu 20.04 with Ubuntu Studio installed on top ( Dell inspir
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2020, 15:05 + schrieb Phil Holmes:
> We are pleased to announce that Lilypond 2.21.80 has now been
> released and is available to download and install. This is the first
> release candidate for the next stable version: 2.22.0, so we would be
> grateful if as many users as
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:35:56PM +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > yes, removing the initial 'filetype off' from .vimrc fixed it. So is
> > that a mistake
> > in https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/usage/text-editor-
> > support ?
I use the exact code specified in that document (which tu
Hi Damian,
I cannot confirm this, removing the toggle of 'filetype' completely
breaks the file type detection for me if I don't have pacman's lilypond
installed. I'd guess this is probably because switching it from off to
on makes vim re-evaluate the type for the current buffer (after adding
the '
Hi Jonasyes, removing the initial 'filetype off' from .vimrc fixed it. So is that a mistake in https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/usage/text-editor-support ?thanksDamianOn 14 November 2020 at 20:25, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:Hi,Am Donnerstag, den 12.11.2020, 16:26 + schrieb damianlegassic
10 matches
Mail list logo
