Hi Martin,
That's probably from pasting into email.
Andrew
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 16:27, Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2019, Andrew Bernard wrote:
>
> > Add this code to ~/.vimrc:
> >
> > " lilypond reformat (acb)
> > " reformat buffer, and return cursor to about the same plac
On Fri, 10 May 2019, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Add this code to ~/.vimrc:
" lilypond reformat (acb)
" reformat buffer, and return cursor to about the same place.
fun DoLilypondReformat()
let l = line(".")
let c = col(".")
:%!ly reformat
call cursor(l, c)
endfun
au Filetype lilypo
Am 10.05.19 um 02:46 schrieb David Wright:
You know that Frescobaldi can convert absolute to relative and vice
versa?
As can the ly standalone (derived from F~ possibly).
Sorry I don't understand.
ly, packaged as python3-ly in Debian, has a number of commands hived
off (I assume) fro
Hi Werner,
Interesting. I'll have some investigation. But close enough is good enough
for me. In the majority of cases in my work, no lines are added or deleted,
so I end up back very close.
Thanks!
Andrew
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 15:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > [...] Note that, as with al
> [...] Note that, as with all code tidying programs, you can only
> return the cursor to approximately the same position, as lines may
> be added of deleted.
Are you sure about that? In Emacs, I can set a marker property that
`sticks' to a given character. As long as this character is not
de
For those who use vim, I'm posting this as result of my discovery of
python3-ly reformat thanks to David Wright in the hope that others may find
it useful.
This is for Debian or Ubuntu, and assumes the Python package python3-ly is
installed.
Add this code to ~/.vimrc:
" lilypond reformat (acb)
"
HI David,
Well I am delighted utterly. I can't use Frescobaldi anymore as the program
takes minutes to position the cursor in my complex scores, due to issues
that have been discussed on detail on the lists. So I switched to gvim
(principally because the emacs lilypond mode is buggy and the indent
On Thu 09 May 2019 at 21:40:30 (+0200), Gianmaria Lari wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 21:32, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Thu 09 May 2019 at 20:20:36 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> > > Gianmaria Lari writes:
> > >
> > > > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond
>
Hi Stefano,
Am Mi., 8. Mai 2019 um 05:16 Uhr schrieb Stefano Troncaro
:
> my workflow in these scenarios is to go to the description of the object
> which is giving me trouble, see what interfaces and properties it has, and
> from there work out what I need to do. This is also what the Lilypond
Am 9. Mai 2019 21:40:30 MESZ schrieb Gianmaria Lari :
>On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 21:32, David Wright
>wrote:
>
>> On Thu 09 May 2019 at 20:20:36 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
>> > Gianmaria Lari writes:
>> >
>> > > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the
>lilypond
>> ml.
>> >
Am 9. Mai 2019 21:52:49 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup :
>David Wright writes:
>
>> one note has a dramatic effect on the following music, but is easily
>> corrected with one tick. When this trick has been applied, many notes
>> may have to be individually tickled after the mistake is discovered.
>
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 21:32, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 09 May 2019 at 20:20:36 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> > Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >
> > > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond
> ml.
> > >
> > > I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and pers
David Wright writes:
> one note has a dramatic effect on the following music, but is easily
> corrected with one tick. When this trick has been applied, many notes
> may have to be individually tickled after the mistake is discovered.
I was of the opinion that Frescobaldi can transpose regions.
On Thu 09 May 2019 at 20:20:36 (+0200), David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond ml.
> >
> > I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I decided
> > to stick to fixed mainly because I find fix
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 20:20, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond
> ml.
> >
> > I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I
> decided
> > to stick to fixed mainly because I find fixing mi
Am 9. Mai 2019 20:20:36 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup :
>Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
>> I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the
>lilypond ml.
>>
>> I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I
>decided
>> to stick to fixed mainly because I find fixing mista
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond ml.
>
> I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I decided
> to stick to fixed mainly because I find fixing mistakes in relative mode is
> much more annoying than writing in fix
On 2019-05-09 6:37 am, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
Hi,
is there a straightforward way to remove a cautionary clef at the end
of a line when the clef changes between the current and the next line
while keeping it at the beginning of the next line?
I tried different settings for break-visibility and \
I saw the discussion about fixed vs relative few times in the lilypond ml.
I think it's a lot about personal taste and habit and personally I decided
to stick to fixed mainly because I find fixing mistakes in relative mode is
much more annoying than writing in fixed way
But what if the editor
On Thu, 9 May 2019, Malte Meyn wrote:
> Am 09.05.19 um 16:53 schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:
> > Is there any simple way to modify the vertical spacing between numerator
> > and denominator in a numeric time signature?
> >
>
> Not really simple. But it can be done by redefining the stencil:
Than
Am 09.05.19 um 16:53 schrieb msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca:
Is there any simple way to modify the vertical spacing between numerator
and denominator in a numeric time signature?
Not really simple. But it can be done by redefining the stencil:
\version "2.21.0"
#(define (fraction-with-gap gap)
Is there any simple way to modify the vertical spacing between numerator
and denominator in a numeric time signature?
--
Matthew Skala
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before tribes.
https://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
___
lilypond-user mailing l
Hi,
is there a straightforward way to remove a cautionary clef at the end
of a line when the clef changes between the current and the next line
while keeping it at the beginning of the next line?
I tried different settings for break-visibility and \omit but that
either removes the Clefs alltoget
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 14:18, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> >>
> >>
> >> \version "2.21.0"
> >> <<
> >> \new Staff {
> >> c'4 d' e' f'
> >> \repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f' | g' a' b' c''}
> >> }
> >> \new ChordNames \with { chordChanges = ##t } {
> >> g1 \once
Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>>
>> \version "2.21.0"
>> <<
>> \new Staff {
>> c'4 d' e' f'
>> \repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f' | g' a' b' c''}
>> }
>> \new ChordNames \with { chordChanges = ##t } {
>> g1 \once \unset chordChanges \repeat volta 2 {g1|1}
>> }
>> >>
>>
>
> Thank you D
Lol, that's what I get for dealing with this stuff before going to sleep. I
realized of my mistake after turning off the computer and laughed at the
situation. I never doubted that someone would point out my stupidity.
El jue., 9 may. 2019 a las 2:52, David Kastrup () escribió:
> Stefano Troncaro
>
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> <<
> \new Staff {
> c'4 d' e' f'
> \repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f' | g' a' b' c''}
> }
> \new ChordNames \with { chordChanges = ##t } {
> g1 \once \unset chordChanges \repeat volta 2 {g1|1}
> }
> >>
>
Thank you David, this is what I wanted!
In the mean
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> Following code prints chord even if they don't change.
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> <<
> \new Staff {
> c'4 d' e' f'
> \repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f' | g' a' b' c''}
> }
> \new ChordNames {
> g1 \repeat volta 2 {g1|1}
> }
>>>
>
> To avoid to print chords al
Following code prints chord even if they don't change.
\version "2.21.0"
<<
\new Staff {
c'4 d' e' f'
\repeat volta 2 {c' d' e' f' | g' a' b' c''}
}
\new ChordNames {
g1 \repeat volta 2 {g1|1}
}
>>
To avoid to print chords always, I used \set chordChanges = ##t. but I
w
29 matches
Mail list logo
