On 27/04/2019 05:39, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello folks,
Who decided to switch from .xml to .musicxml, and what was the supposed gain in
the move? I now find that some text editors don’t propose such files in their
file open dialog..
The change is recorded on the MusicXML GitHub page
https://g
Found this in the Wiki on MusicXML
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12/30/music_as_mark_up/ . News to me,
tho maybe not to anyone else.
For convenience: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML .
Rgds, G.
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Menu
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 12:39 A
I love your album! Thanks for sharing it with us!
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Malte,
Am 27.04.19 um 10:49 schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 26.04.19 um 14:45 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
I might also be willing to use LaTeX for the creation of the symbols
because I could then combine efforts for a standalone LaTeX package
to produce the symbols in continuous text too.
I'd
Hi Lukas and all,
Am 26.04.19 um 23:15 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
Hi,
but I have to some degree lost track of
much of the discussion of the last 20 years, and when I actively worked
with that kind of written harmonic analysis (while at the
Musikhochschule) I didn't have much of a scholarly mi
A very creditable production. Don't worry about the letter/A4 issue, it
printed out perfectly on my A4 system. There is one problem though, the
tempo marks have all printed as odd line shapes: steps, symbols like pi
or just vertical bars. The display in Firefox is correct however.
It was intere