Am 22.04.19 um 08:34 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Hi Urs,
The non-redraw problem happens on the small files for the outline
counter I submitted to oll-misc. Not my complex scores.
I am well aware that as a software developer if I can't provide a way
to reproduce this we can't file a bug. This is
Hi Urs,
The non-redraw problem happens on the small files for the outline counter I
submitted to oll-misc. Not my complex scores.
I am well aware that as a software developer if I can't provide a way to
reproduce this we can't file a bug. This is a pity, because the phenomenon
is definitely prese
Hi Andrew,
I don't see any issue with you sending this on-list accidentally because
I think this is where it should be discussed.
Am 22.04.19 um 04:31 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
Dear Urs,
On a different tack altogether, with the oll work, you have a usage
file and a module.ily, so two files. I
Hi David,
Was meant to be offlist to Urs, but never mind.
Frescobaldi always used to update just fine, with no manual intervention.
The behaviour has changed, and it si only when you have two separate files
involved. It's only been happening since say, Ubuntu 18.04 or so (but don't
ask me to cert
On Mon 22 Apr 2019 at 12:31:54 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> Dear Urs,
>
> On a different tack altogether, with the oll work, you have a usage file
> and a module.ily, so two files. In my Frescobaldi 3 on a brand new Ubuntu
> 19 installation (the latest release as of last week) it still shows t
Dear Urs,
On a different tack altogether, with the oll work, you have a usage file
and a module.ily, so two files. In my Frescobaldi 3 on a brand new Ubuntu
19 installation (the latest release as of last week) it still shows the
problem I mentioned a while ago where the output PDF is not updated a
Hi Thomas,
> ...
> Thanks again!
You're welcome.
I used 'funny' (weird) procedure and variable names, but if the procedure is to
be
exposed to your users, and with the objective of making it simple to use, read
and
maintain, as you described later in your answer, you could write it as - using
Hi all, long time since I posted here, hope you all have been well!
While using the Edition Engraver today I noticed that the following
override works in the old refactor override branch, while on the current
master it prints a textless spanner and a warning:
\version "2.19.80"
\include "oll-core
Am So., 21. Apr. 2019 um 02:34 Uhr schrieb David Pirotte :
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > ...
> > Thanks pointing me to this possibility, in my use-case I then could do:
> > (define (p) (cons '(1 2 3) '(4 5 6)))
> > (define l1 '(a b c))
> > (define l2 '(x y z))
> > (cons* l1 l2 (car (p)) (cdr (p)) '())
> > =
"E Appeldoorn" writes:
> I have defined this function in an include.ly file
>
> MyMarkup = {
> \markup
> \override #'(adjust-x-pos . 1.0)
>\override #'(adjust-length . 1.5)
> }
Unlikely.
> How can I extend that example
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hi Ursus,
>
> Apologies, you most likely want to define a new markup function.
Markup command.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
