Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2019-02-18 9:28 pm, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it
>> as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you
>> want... :-)
[...]
> I would recommend using simple markup either at the beginning
On 2019-02-18 9:28 pm, Federico Bruni wrote:
I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it
as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you
want... :-)
Il giorno lun 18 feb 2019 alle 20:06, Stig Brautaset
ha scritto:
Hi Federico,
Well, I won't try
I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it
as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you
want... :-)
Il giorno lun 18 feb 2019 alle 20:06, Stig Brautaset
ha scritto:
Hi Federico,
Well, I won't try to explain I understand how it works, but
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags
> should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for
> modern/old-straight-flags.
I forgot to mention that in the only example that I have at hand of
horizontal flags (Xenakis
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió:
> Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags
> should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for
> modern/old-straight-flags.
And now I tend to agree with you... :-)
Both examples I mentioned in my other email (Boulez
Hi Federico,
Well, I won't try to explain I understand how it works, but I was able
to adapt it to something that gives me the result I want:
\version "2.19.80"
eight = \markup {8.}
\repeat volta 8 {
%% This numbers the repeat block.
\set Score.repeatCommands =
#(list(list 'volta eight) 'st
Are you sure it applies to your case?
You said you did not have alternatives...
See the simple workaround suggested in this issue:
https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1409/
Il giorno dom 17 feb 2019 alle 0:41, Stig Brautaset
ha scritto:
Thanks! I actually found that example earli
Peter,
Does this work?
\version "2.19.81"
<<
\new Staff \relative { c''1 c }
\new Staff \relative { c'1 c }
\new Staff \relative { \clef bass c1 c }
\new Staff \relative { \clef bass c,1 1}
>>
If you want different grouping look at
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/
Urs Liska writes:
> Can someone explain to me why \overrideProperty Staff.BarLine.color
> #red colors the barlines in *all* staves while \override
> Staff.BarLine.color = #red only affects the current Staff context?
>
> I have just re-read
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/se
Can someone explain to me why \overrideProperty Staff.BarLine.color #red
colors the barlines in *all* staves while \override Staff.BarLine.color
= #red only affects the current Staff context?
I have just re-read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/set-versus-override
and am s
Forgot CCing to the list ...
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Re: extended piano 4 staves system
Datum: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:02:46 +0100
Von:Urs Liska
An: Peter Renner-Motz
Hi Peter,
there's no simple solution to cover *100%* of what you are looking for
11 matches
Mail list logo