Re: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?

2019-02-18 Thread Stig Brautaset
Aaron Hill writes: > On 2019-02-18 9:28 pm, Federico Bruni wrote: >> I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it >> as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you >> want... :-) [...] > I would recommend using simple markup either at the beginning

Re: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?

2019-02-18 Thread Aaron Hill
On 2019-02-18 9:28 pm, Federico Bruni wrote: I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you want... :-) Il giorno lun 18 feb 2019 alle 20:06, Stig Brautaset ha scritto: Hi Federico, Well, I won't try

RE: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?

2019-02-18 Thread Federico Bruni
I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you want... :-) Il giorno lun 18 feb 2019 alle 20:06, Stig Brautaset ha scritto: Hi Federico, Well, I won't try to explain I understand how it works, but

Re: modern-straight and flat- flags too thick and too spaced apart

2019-02-18 Thread edes
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió: > Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags > should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for > modern/old-straight-flags. I forgot to mention that in the only example that I have at hand of horizontal flags (Xenakis

Re: modern-straight and flat- flags too thick and too spaced apart

2019-02-18 Thread edes
el 2019-02-17 a las 21:41 Thomas Morley escribió: > Speaking only for myself I think the OP is correct saying flat-flags > should behave like Beams, though I don't agree for > modern/old-straight-flags. And now I tend to agree with you... :-) Both examples I mentioned in my other email (Boulez

RE: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?

2019-02-18 Thread Stig Brautaset
Hi Federico, Well, I won't try to explain I understand how it works, but I was able to adapt it to something that gives me the result I want: \version "2.19.80" eight = \markup {8.} \repeat volta 8 { %% This numbers the repeat block. \set Score.repeatCommands = #(list(list 'volta eight) 'st

RE: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?

2019-02-18 Thread Federico Bruni
Are you sure it applies to your case? You said you did not have alternatives... See the simple workaround suggested in this issue: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1409/ Il giorno dom 17 feb 2019 alle 0:41, Stig Brautaset ha scritto: Thanks! I actually found that example earli

RE: extended piano 4 staves system

2019-02-18 Thread Mark Stephen Mrotek
Peter, Does this work? \version "2.19.81" << \new Staff \relative { c''1 c } \new Staff \relative { c'1 c } \new Staff \relative { \clef bass c1 c } \new Staff \relative { \clef bass c,1 1} >> If you want different grouping look at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/

Re: Contexts affected by \override and \overrideProperty

2019-02-18 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Can someone explain to me why \overrideProperty Staff.BarLine.color > #red colors the barlines in *all* staves while \override > Staff.BarLine.color = #red only affects the current Staff context? > > I have just re-read > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/se

Contexts affected by \override and \overrideProperty

2019-02-18 Thread Urs Liska
Can someone explain to me why \overrideProperty Staff.BarLine.color #red colors the barlines in *all* staves while \override Staff.BarLine.color = #red only affects the current Staff context? I have just re-read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/set-versus-override and am s

Fwd: Re: extended piano 4 staves system

2019-02-18 Thread Urs Liska
Forgot CCing to the list ... Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Re: extended piano 4 staves system Datum: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:02:46 +0100 Von:Urs Liska An: Peter Renner-Motz Hi Peter, there's no simple solution to cover *100%* of what you are looking for