Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> The most sensible solution to me seems to be for Tie to use the
> neutral-direction property and heed it in such cases, overriding the
> direction if it is set.
Using Harm's example, setting Tie.neutral-direction to #DOWN will just flip
everything around.
Then, the first
The most sensible solution to me seems to be for Tie to use the
neutral-direction property and heed it in such cases, overriding the
direction if it is set.
Best, Simon
On 26.07.2018 13:34, Robert Schmaus wrote:
Might be the same thing as here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Curious-
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I stumbled across
>>> (equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
>>> returning false.
>>>
>>> Is it expected behaviour?
>>
>> equal? is not implemented all that great for "probs" but Music::equal_p
>> is impleme
David Kastrup writes:
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumbled across
>> (equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
>> returning false.
>>
>> Is it expected behaviour?
>
> equal? is not implemented all that great for "probs" but Music::equal_p
> is implemented in a manner where at least
>
> #(d
Might be the same thing as here:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Curious-thing-about-ties-td196616.html
> On 26 Jul 2018, at 12:37, Thomas Morley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please consider the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \relative c'' {
> f,1
> r4 b~ b8 a b4~
> b8 a b2.
>
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 26.07.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumbled across
>> (equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
>> returning false.
>>
>> Is it expected behaviour?
>
> Check with \displayMusic, but I'd suspect that #{ \voiceOne #} might
> add an additional layer of sequenti
Am 26.07.2018 um 12:32 schrieb Thomas Morley:
2018-07-26 12:20 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
Am 26.07.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
I stumbled across
(equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
returning false.
Is it expected behaviour?
Check with \displayMusic, but I'd suspect that #{ \voice
Hi,
please consider the following example:
\version "2.19.82"
\relative c'' {
f,1
r4 b~ b8 a b4~
b8 a b2.
\repeat unfold 8 f8
}
The ties have different directions.
If you change the example a little bit you may (or may not) get equal
directions.
Where does it comes from?
Or wit differe
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled across
> (equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
> returning false.
>
> Is it expected behaviour?
equal? is not implemented all that great for "probs" but Music::equal_p
is implemented in a manner where at least
#(display (equal? voiceOne (ly:music-deep-cop
2018-07-26 12:20 GMT+02:00 Urs Liska :
>
>
> Am 26.07.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I stumbled across
>> (equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
>> returning false.
>>
>> Is it expected behaviour?
>
>
> Check with \displayMusic, but I'd suspect that #{ \voiceOne #} might add an
>
Am 26.07.2018 um 11:57 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
I stumbled across
(equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
returning false.
Is it expected behaviour?
Check with \displayMusic, but I'd suspect that #{ \voiceOne #} might add
an additional layer of sequential-music around the variable.
Urs
Hi,
I stumbled across
(equal? #{ \voiceOne #} voiceOne)
returning false.
Is it expected behaviour?
And is the condition in the function below robust?
check =
#(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?)
(music-map
(lambda (m)
(if (equal? m #{ \voiceOne #})
;; below will
Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
> Hi Risto,
>
> you might go this way:
>
> lineThickness = 5
> \markup \override #`(thickness . ,lineThickness) \draw-hline
>
> That is semi-quote the pair with ` (instead of ') and then "unquote" the
> variable to retrieve the value with a comma (,)
Which is equivalent t
Whoa! I would have never found that out by myself. :) Thanks Urs &
Jan-Peter. I have to check the Scheme link, too.
BR,
Risto
On 26 July 2018 at 10:40, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi Risto,
>
> you might go this way:
>
> lineThickness = 5
> \markup \override #`(thickness . ,lineThickness) \draw-hl
Hi Risto,
you might go this way:
lineThickness = 5
\markup \override #`(thickness . ,lineThickness) \draw-hline
That is semi-quote the pair with ` (instead of ') and then "unquote" the
variable to retrieve the value with a comma (,)
HTH
Jan-Peter
Am 26.07.2018 um 09:35 schrieb Risto Vääräniemi
Am 26.07.2018 um 09:35 schrieb Risto Vääräniemi:
Hi,
I tried the following:
lineThickness = 5
\markup \override #'(thickness . #lineThickness) \draw-hline
But it seems I cannot give the variable inside the pair. This works:
lineThicknessPair = #'(thickness . 5)
\markup \override #lineThickn
Hi,
I tried the following:
lineThickness = 5
\markup \override #'(thickness . #lineThickness) \draw-hline
But it seems I cannot give the variable inside the pair. This works:
lineThicknessPair = #'(thickness . 5)
\markup \override #lineThicknessPair \draw-hline
Is there any way to make it work
17 matches
Mail list logo
