FWIW, I just tried this out on my decrepit Windows 7 machine (64-bit, 8GB,
i7 core). After about 8 minutes of whizzing and whirring at 12% CPU
capacity and utilising just under 5 GB of RAM, it returned the same error.
Brent.
On Thu, 10 May 2018 at 1:14 pm, Brent Annable
wrote:
> Being a layman
Being a layman, most of this is all going over my head. But I gather that
compiling this particular project will not be possible for the time being
on my current machine, so I’ll either try to get my decrepit laptop up and
running, or ask a friend to help out :-)
Thanks for the replies,
Brent.
On
> I have no idea what it would entail to also provide 64bit Windows
> binaries.
Last time I looked (about 1.5 years ago) the problem was a missing
mingw-w64 package that exists for mingw (the 32bit version) for which I
think it is not actually required for the lilypond build, only for GUB
in gener
Samuel Speer writes:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> 1.82G is a bit of a strange number for a 64bit binary. Are you using a
>> 64bit Windows and definitely a 64bit LilyPond (!) executable?
>>
>
> I checked my executable and it looks to be 32-bit. However, I couldn't
>> What about setting up GUB (with LilyPond) on
>> https://hydra.nixos.org/? Other GNU projects like Emacs are also
>> hosted there for daily builds, so it should be easy to get lilypond
>> registered there...
>>
>> https://nixos.org/hydra/
>
> Are you going to do it?
Basically, I'm intereste
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM David Kastrup wrote:
> 1.82G is a bit of a strange number for a 64bit binary. Are you using a
> 64bit Windows and definitely a 64bit LilyPond (!) executable?
>
I checked my executable and it looks to be 32-bit. However, I couldn't find
a 64-bit version on lilypon
Not much help, but the source seems o.k.
MacBook Air (2013), 4GB Ram, OS 10.13.4- for what it’s worth, compiled the file
successfully and output a pdf of 104 pages.
Stan
> On May 9, 2018, at 11:17 AM, tyronicus wrote:
>
> Phil Holmes wrote
>> My guess is that there's a memory allocation probl
On 09/05/18 15:42, Karlin High wrote:
On 5/9/2018 8:16 AM, Ben wrote:
I also ran into your issue by compiling "SG_complete_DE.ly" on my
Windows 10 machine. 32GB RAM. Newest i7 build.
Curiouser and curiouser... It compiled successfully on my Windows 7
Pro x64 SP1, Intel Core i5-3450, 24 GB RAM
tyronicus writes:
> Phil Holmes wrote
>> My guess is that there's a memory allocation problem that only shows up on
>> large projects on Windows.
>
> That's my suspicion, too. I tried it on a Win10 i7-8xxx with 8G ram and saw
> it cut out around 1.85G memory every time. When I remove two bookpart
Phil Holmes wrote
> My guess is that there's a memory allocation problem that only shows up on
> large projects on Windows.
That's my suspicion, too. I tried it on a Win10 i7-8xxx with 8G ram and saw
it cut out around 1.85G memory every time. When I remove two bookparts, it
only uses 1.82G of memo
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> What about setting up GUB (with LilyPond) on https://hydra.nixos.org/?
> Other GNU projects like Emacs are also hosted there for daily
> builds, so it should be easy to get lilypond registered there...
>
> https://nixos.org/hydra/
Are you going to do it?
Like with any
> On my GUB build machine (4 core hyperthreaded i7, 8 Gigs, SSD) an
> incremental build (i.e. with a stable version of GUB with the
> toolset all up to date) takes around one to one and a half hours.
> If GUB needs updating, it can, as you say, take over 6 hours even on
> that machine. The upload
Am 09.05.2018 um 17:23 schrieb Phil Holmes:
Question: How difficult/costly/... would it be to prepare a "daily
build from current master" for download?
Very. We are talking about 6 hours of build time on a pretty solidly
powered 8-processor machine. Actually, we _were_ talking about that
befo
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Lukas-Fabian Moser"
Cc: "lilypond-user" ;
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.20
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
(I, for example, just recently switched to self-compiled Lilypond
because of Malte's a
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> (I, for example, just recently switched to self-compiled Lilypond
> because of Malte's amazing work on the \haydnTurn which was prompted
> by my question. To my surprise, compiling turned out to be quite easy,
> but of course there /were /some slight dependency issues
- Original Message -
From: "Lukas-Fabian Moser"
To: ; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.20
But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists can
be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. A
Might be simplest to create a Linux VM on the Windows box and use that for very
big projects. My guess is that there's a memory allocation problem that only
shows up on large projects on Windows.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Brent Annable
To: David Kastrup
Cc:
On 5/9/2018 8:16 AM, Ben wrote:
I also ran into your issue by compiling "SG_complete_DE.ly" on my
Windows 10 machine. 32GB RAM. Newest i7 build.
Curiouser and curiouser... It compiled successfully on my Windows 7 Pro
x64 SP1, Intel Core i5-3450, 24 GB RAM, LilyPond 2.19.80
--
Karlin High
Miss
On 2018-05-09 15:59, Brent Annable wrote:
Thanks everyone. Yeah I forgot to mention: I'm on a Windows 10
Thinkpad machine with i7 and 16GB RAM. So looks like the errors are
coming through on the same systems.
Sigh. What to do? I have an old laptop with a rocket-engine fan that I
could try..
But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists
can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a
huge number of answers requires at least 2.19.xx but people
understandably don’t want to install an “unstable” version.
IIUC, the situation used to be:
Brent Annable writes:
> Thanks everyone. Yeah I forgot to mention: I'm on a Windows 10 Thinkpad
> machine with i7 and 16GB RAM. So looks like the errors are coming through
> on the same systems.
>
> Sigh. What to do? I have an old laptop with a rocket-engine fan that I
> could try
I consider
On 5/9/2018 9:59 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
Thanks everyone. Yeah I forgot to mention: I'm on a Windows 10
Thinkpad machine with i7 and 16GB RAM. So looks like the errors are
coming through on the same systems.
Sigh. What to do? I have an old laptop with a rocket-engine fan that I
could try
Thanks everyone. Yeah I forgot to mention: I'm on a Windows 10 Thinkpad
machine with i7 and 16GB RAM. So looks like the errors are coming through
on the same systems.
Sigh. What to do? I have an old laptop with a rocket-engine fan that I
could try
Brent.
On 9 May 2018 at 23:28, David Kastrup
Ben writes:
> On 5/9/2018 8:35 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile a very large project, it keeps crashing and
>> I'm at a loss as to the cause. Some details:
>>
>> - The error first appears as a Windows notification saying: "
>> Runtime error! This application ha
Am 09.05.2018 um 15:16 schrieb Ben:
I also ran into your issue by compiling "SG_complete_DE.ly" on my
Windows 10 machine. 32GB RAM. Newest i7 build.
So, there is some consistency...I see the same errors you do.
However, I compiled your project successfully (and quite fast) on my
Linux Mint l
On 5/9/2018 8:35 AM, Brent Annable wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to compile a very large project, it keeps crashing and I'm
at a loss as to the cause. Some details:
- The error first appears as a Windows notification saying: " Runtime
error! This application has requested the Runtime to ter
Am 9. Mai 2018 12:18:37 MESZ schrieb Aaron Hill :
>On 2018-05-09 02:49, Malte Meyn wrote:
>> But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists
>> can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a
>> huge number of answers requires at least 2.19.xx but peopl
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 9 May 2018 at 10:45, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>>
>> > On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
>> >
>> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > At the moment I do this
>> >> >
>> >> > \version "2.19.81"
>> >> > var = {a b \tag #'last
On 2018-05-09 02:49, Malte Meyn wrote:
But an increasing number of questions asked in forums or on the lists
can be answered by “compile current master or wait for 2.21.0”. And a
huge number of answers requires at least 2.19.xx but people
understandably don’t want to install an “unstable” version
On 9 May 2018 at 10:45, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> >
> >> Gianmaria Lari writes:
> >> >
> >> > At the moment I do this
> >> >
> >> > \version "2.19.81"
> >> > var = {a b \tag #'lastnote a}
> >> > {\removeWithTag #'lastn
Am 09.05.2018 um 11:16 schrieb David Kastrup:
Aaron Hill writes:
Hi folks,
It would seem the release of version 2.20 must be nearing, but I have
not found anything published about the release schedule for the
project.
There isn't one.
[CC-ing to lilypond-devel]
I know that you don’t li
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Aaron Hill"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2018 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Release schedule for 2.20
Aaron Hill writes:
Hi folks,
It would seem the release of version 2.20 must be nearing, but I have
not found anything published about the
Aaron Hill writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> It would seem the release of version 2.20 must be nearing, but I have
> not found anything published about the release schedule for the
> project.
There isn't one.
> The website mentions following the info-lilyp...@gnu.org mailing list,
> but according to the
Hi folks,
It would seem the release of version 2.20 must be nearing, but I have
not found anything published about the release schedule for the project.
The website mentions following the info-lilyp...@gnu.org mailing list,
but according to the archives that list hasn't seen a post in years.
If you want a more lightweight way to do it, this function should also work:
⋘
removeBreaks =
#(define-music-function (mus) (ly:music?)
(music-filter
(lambda (v) (not (music-is-of-type? v 'break-event)))
mus))
⋙
On 05/08/18 14:17, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> Hi Herbie,
>
> this
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>> >
>> > At the moment I do this
>> >
>> > \version "2.19.81"
>> > var = {a b \tag #'lastnote a}
>> > {\removeWithTag #'lastnote \var a ~ a}
>> >
>> > but I would like to know if there are othe
On 13 April 2018 at 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > I would like to tie the last note contained in a variable like this
> >
> > \version "2.19.81"
> > var = {a b a}
> > {\var ~ a}
> >
> > but this generates an error. This is just a simple example, the reason
> why
> >
37 matches
Mail list logo
