On 13.03.2018 15:52, Torsten Hämmerle wrote:
What do you think?
Even if I seem to be in a minority here, take my vote in favour of the
traditional Feta design. It’s certainly contentious in much the same way
as its treble clef, but I like it.
Best, Simon
___
Hi Lucas,
sorry for the late reply
2018-03-16 0:50 GMT+01:00 Lucas Werkmeister :
> Perhaps we can submit this as an update for the snippet repository? (I’d be
> happy to do the paperwork if you’re okay with it.)
>
> Not tested beyond the given examples, though.
>
> FWIW, it seems to work fine in
On 3/18/2018 1:26 PM, Алексей Алексеев wrote:
This code:
```
\version "2.18.2"
\parallelMusic #'(upperNest lowerNest) {
d''1 |
d'1 |
}
\parallelMusic #'(upper lower) {
\upperNest |
\lowerNest |
}
```
produce "Bars in parallel music don't have the same length" warnings.
Why? Is it bug
On 3/18/2018 1:26 PM, Алексей Алексеев wrote:
This code:
```
\version "2.18.2"
\parallelMusic #'(upperNest lowerNest) {
d''1 |
d'1 |
}
\parallelMusic #'(upper lower) {
\upperNest |
\lowerNest |
}
```
produce "Bars in parallel music don't have the same length" warnings.
Why? Is it bug
This code:
```
\version "2.18.2"
\parallelMusic #'(upperNest lowerNest) {
d''1 |
d'1 |
}
\parallelMusic #'(upper lower) {
\upperNest |
\lowerNest |
}
```
produce "Bars in parallel music don't have the same length" warnings.
Why? Is it bug in lilypond?
_
Wols Lists writes:
> This is close to what I do, and I have to regularly transpose parts
> between Bb-treble and concert-bass.
>
> Bear in mind that lily does not assume western tonal music, so when you
> say "transpose" it doesn't take scales into account - it just shifts
> everything by that in
On 17/03/18 23:54, Glassmenagerie wrote:
> By accident I came across another possible solution.
>
> \score {
>
>
> \transpose c g {
> \relative g' {
> \time 2/4
>
> g8[-.\p g ( aes ) aes] (
> g g4 ) g8 (
> f ) f4 f8 (
> g\<[ ) g ( f\> ees]\! )
> d4 ( c
> bes
You are right, it should be c1..
But I wonder if is there a predefined function for doing the job, instead
of writing a custom Scheme code.
2018-03-18 13:05 GMT+01:00 Malte Meyn :
>
>
> Am 18.03.2018 um 12:58 schrieb paolo prete:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> given a sequence of tied notes/chords, is there
Am 18.03.2018 um 12:58 schrieb paolo prete:
Hello,
given a sequence of tied notes/chords, is there a way to automatically
combine them into a minimal
sequence of long notes obtained with the sum of the sequence's durations?
Something like:
c4~ c4~ c4~ > c2.
c4~ c4~ c4~ c4~ c4 --->
Hello,
given a sequence of tied notes/chords, is there a way to automatically
combine them into a minimal
sequence of long notes obtained with the sum of the sequence's durations?
Something like:
c4~ c4~ c4~ > c2.
c4~ c4~ c4~ c4~ c4 ---> c1~ c4
c4~ c4~ c4~ c4~ c4~ c4~ c4 > c1~ c
Am 17.03.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Lucas Werkmeister:
Can confirm, coredumpctl shows loads of t1asm core dumps (no idea why
there’s no error message in the terminal), and downgrading to t1utils
1.39 fixed the problem (1.40 seems buggy as well). Thanks for the info!
I’m back from Lisbon and can co
11 matches
Mail list logo
