David,
Thanks for the direction.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
David Kastrup
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2018 3:20 PM
To: Caagr98
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Name of the command
Caagr98 wri
Urs,
Thank you.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Urs
Liska
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2018 3:20 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Name of the command
Am 02.01.2018 um 00:12 schrieb Caagr98:
> A
Am 02.01.2018 um 00:12 schrieb Caagr98:
Are you thinking of `\set tieWaitForChord = ##t \grace {blah} blah \unset
tieWaitForChord`?
No, of
\set tieWaitForNote
Urs
On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello,
A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to t
Dammit. I did look it up in the source code, but then I wrote it wrong here.
On 01/02/18 00:19, David Kastrup wrote:
> Caagr98 writes:
>
>>> On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Hello,
A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the
fo
Caagr98 writes:
>> On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the
>>> following chord, e.g.,
>>>
>>> \grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought it was
>>>
>>> \tie WaitforChord, yet that i
Are you thinking of `\set tieWaitForChord = ##t \grace {blah} blah \unset
tieWaitForChord`?
On 01/02/18 00:07, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the following
> chord, e.g.,
>
> \grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2.
>
>
>
> I tho
Hello,
A command exists that allows the notes of a grace to be tied to the
following chord, e.g.,
\grace {c8~ e~ g~} 2.
I thought it was
\tie WaitforChord, yet that is not correct. Tried searching the manual.
Any direction appreciated.
Mark
___
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 5:08 PM Gianmaria Lari
wrote:
> Ciao Michael,
>
> Thank you for your help, now it works!!
>
Great. I added some more explanatory text to help others not stumble over
it.
> Some suggestion about your test page:
> - The text box where you can write the music is too large. M
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:08 PM wrote:
> David Kastrup:
> > Michael Ellis writes:
> ...
> > > The MuseScore output is correct and matches the tempo and meter items
> > > embedded in the original midi file (attached). I've also verified
> with 2 different
> > > DAW's (Reaper and Logic X) that th
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:11 PM Michael Ellis
wrote:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>
>- I get correct PDF output on 2.21.0 but a nonsensical wash of bar
>checks that appear to cater to 2/4 throughout.
>
>
> I'll try upgrading to 2.21 and see if that makes any difference.
>
Hmmm, I don't see a 2
That works great, thanks! I need to manually override Y-offset, but that's fine.
I also made this function to add holes in the bracket (requires setting the
bracket's layer to -1):
whiteout =
#(define-event-function (x y) (number-pair? number-pair?)
#{
\tweak layer #0
\tweak Y-offse
"Caagr98" wrote 01/01/2018 18:17:37
\repeat volta 2 {R1}
\alternative {
{a4 a a a a a a a}
{R1}
}
In this example, the volta is moved very far up because of that one
note. This is very ugly IMO. Is there any way to insert a hole in the
line and have the note stick up over the volta?
\repeat volta 2 {R1}
\alternative {
{a4 a a a a a a a}
{R1}
}
In this example, the volta is moved very far up because of that one note. This
is very ugly IMO. Is there any way to insert a hole in the line and have the
note stick up over the volta?
___
I explicitly consent!
Regards
Am 01.01.2018 16:45, schrieb Shane Brandes:
I don't think anyone is blaming you. We are just trying to help you
succeed. I think everyone here has encountered the dependency mismatch
hell somewhere along the line. And it is never a good time. Take a few
days off f
I don't think anyone is blaming you. We are just trying to help you
succeed. I think everyone here has encountered the dependency mismatch
hell somewhere along the line. And it is never a good time. Take a few
days off from fighting with it. Then try it again.
regards,
Shane
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 a
Am 01-Jan-2018 11:39:29 +0100 schrieb li...@openlilylib.org:
I think we have an issue with duplication of instructions.
May I suggest to
* replace the "Installing from source" sections on
http://frescobaldi.org/download with links to the more detailed Wiki pages
* Update the Wik
You write "Ubuntu 17", there are two versions
Ubuntu 17.04 (Zesty Zapus)
On 17.04 I never got running frecobaldi3 and reported repeatedly about.
Ubuntu 17.10 (Artful Aardvark)
On 17.10 it is possible to install, as others confirmed reading the
actual mails in the thread.
An ubuntu update might cu
Am 01.01.2018 um 01:35 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
Oh please, did you even read what bb wrote? He was talking about that
very same instruction, which has multiple issues:
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/1048
https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/1045
Also, one needs python-ly 0
Am 31.12.2017 um 17:20 schrieb Neo Anderson:
1. How to change the look of the extender lines (dashes)? I'd like them
to be more dense or compact. The following -\tweaks with various values
won't make a difference.
-\tweak bound-details.dash-fraction #0
-\tweak bound-details.dash-per
Hi Urs and Simon,
Since everybody wants to blame me here, I'll bow out.
Something wrong with my Ubuntu 17. I can't make it work. I shall give up.
Thanks all for the hints.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.o
20 matches
Mail list logo
