Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-09-23 18:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Thomas Morley writes: > Up to now I've only a vage impression what 'parse-lily-and-compute-lily-string' and #(read-hash-extend ...) does. I'll currently not dive deeper into it unti

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-09-23 18:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > David Kastrup writes: > >> Thomas Morley writes: >>> Up to now I've only a vage impression what >>> 'parse-lily-and-compute-lily-string' and #(read-hash-extend ...) does. >>> I'll currently not dive deeper into it until forced. ;) >> >> -- Scheme Pro

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-09-23 9:31 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Thomas Morley writes: >>> 2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > > Now things become _really_ embarrassing. Trying to come up with > improvements on your regtest convinced me

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

2017-09-23 Thread Jaime Oliver La Rosa
Indeed it is an Ubuntu package. This one worked for me: https://answers.launchpad.net/~canonical-foundations/+archive/ubuntu/python3.6-as-default/+files/python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb The one I installed through apt did not work out. Thanks to everyone! best, J On 09/23/2017

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

2017-09-23 Thread David Wright
On Sat 23 Sep 2017 at 13:11:14 (+0200), Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > I used python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb, I think from debian > despite I have a Ubuntu installation. python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb looks like an Ubuntu package. http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/p

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-09-23 9:31 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> 2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : Now things become _really_ embarrassing. Trying to come up with improvements on your regtest convinced me that this kind of syntactica

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

2017-09-23 Thread Noeck
Hi, I used python3-poppler-qt5_0.24.2-3build1_amd64.deb, I think from debian despite I have a Ubuntu installation. So this is probably not a sane advice but it worked for me. The version in the package repository did not work for me. Cheers, Joram ___

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-09-23 11:56 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : > 2017-09-23 9:31 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >>> I'd like to see an example for LyricText/Hyphen. Like: >>> >>> lyr = \lyricmode { foo } >>> \test "limitation" ##[ \lyr -- #] >> >> More like \test ##[ \lyricmode { \lyr -- } #] I g

Re: Error with Frescobaldi and python-poppler

2017-09-23 Thread SoundsFromSound
Jaime Oliver La Rosa wrote > Hi all, > > I am encountering this problem when trying to engrave any score in > Frescobaldi. The score compiles fine, but I can't see the preview, and I > get the error below as described in this post: > > https://github.com/wbsoft/frescobaldi/issues/838 > > Is th

Re: Regtest for issue 5181 (was: \mark and slur)

2017-09-23 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Not putting up an issue just yet. Need to hear that you're ok with what > amounts to scrapping your work after it helped me figure out why I > wasn't even able to start writing something that I felt good about. To be clear, feel free to use my suggest

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-09-23 9:31 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> >>> Now things become _really_ embarrassing. Trying to come up with >>> improvements on your regtest convinced me that this kind of >>> syntactical feature is not served well by a

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Morley writes: > >> (define (lily-string->markup str) ...) >> seems to be unused (same in display-lily-tests.ly) any reason not to >> delete it? > > Oh. That's the problem with copy&paste jobs. I'll take a look. That's -- disconcerting. This was an oversight in

Re: Regtest for issue 5181

2017-09-23 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-09-22 12:22 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> >> Now things become _really_ embarrassing. Trying to come up with >> improvements on your regtest convinced me that this kind of >> syntactical feature is not served well by a graphical test featuring >> the typeset results.