Hi Andrew,
The manual is not well written concerning this matter. A \tempo is a
metronome mark (I don't think that is entirely obvious).
{
\mark \default
\once \override Score.MetronomeMark.extra-offset = #'(8 . 0)
\tempo "A tempo" 8 = 104
s2^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" } | s2
I didn't see this answered yet, so here is my reply...
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:45 PM, wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Rob Torop
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:45:13 +
> Subject: How can I get a repeat symbol in the chord names part o
> Subject: Re: how to differentiate F1:maj and F1:maj7
> It is the same by default.
>
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/common-
> chord-modifiers
>
> Both modifiers maj and maj7 means major 7th chord. :)
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've been putting up with using this unsa
Am 20.01.2017 um 18:39 schrieb Jérôme Plût:
> Problem 1: why, on the third beat, is the alto voice (playing a g')
> displayed on the "down" Staff?
It doesn’t in LilyPond 2.19.53, which version are you using?
> Problem 2: delete the line saying "<>" and recompile. Now
> all hell breaks loose: th
Consider the following score:
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "up" {
<> % this should do nothing...
<<
\new Voice \relative { e''4 f e }
\new Voice \autochange \relative { a'~ a g }
\new Voice \autochange \relative { c'~ c b }
>> }
\new Staff = "down" { \clef F <<
\new Vo
Hi List,
I have the following code:
systembreaks = \new Voice {
\mark \default
\tempo "A tempo" 8 = 104
s2^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" } | s2*15 \bar "||"
}
in a voice that contains all the tempo/key changes, and other such
markings. In this case, the \markup segno is colliding
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Johannes Roeßler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure, if I'm right on this list for this issue - if not, pls point me
> where to go :)
>
> on http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/
> typesetting-mensural-music
> the example for "Mensuraler F-Schlüssel im Petr
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Alexander Kobel writes:
>>
>>> +1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
>>> ... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
>>> choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming automatic
>>> e
On 2017-01-20 10:46, David Kastrup wrote:
> Knut Petersen writes:
>
>> Hi everybody!
>>
+1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming auto
The autoextender patch only adds extenders at places where extenders
can be added without it.
That does not sound like we should remove __ from lyrics to me.
I don't understand that comment.
With the autoextender patch there will be an extender if a melisma is
detected and there is enough pl
Knut Petersen writes:
> Hi everybody!
>
>>> +1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
>>> ... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
>>> choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming automatic
>>> extenders). Unfortunately, assignment of
David Kastrup writes:
> Alexander Kobel writes:
>
>> +1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
>> ... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
>> choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming automatic
>> extenders). Unfortunately, assignm
Hi everybody!
+1. A personal wish: I think that \lyricsto ChoirStaff = "ctx" {
... } has the potential to be a killer feature w.r.t. usability for
choir literature (especially combined with the upcoming automatic
extenders). Unfortunately, assignment of lyrics to *container*
contexts does not w
13 matches
Mail list logo
