Hi everyone,
In the attached MWE, I'm somehow having trouble getting the initial
`^\markup a` to be placed /above/ the horizontal bracket, even though
all future instances of this markup are placed above the bracket no
problem. It seems so simple; I feel a little silly just asking. The
commen
On 3 May 2016 at 04:53, David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps composers don't sweat over individual notes like that and/or
> don't need a decent looking copy in front of them. Some compose at the
> piano, don't they.
When I’m composing, I don’t want to have to deal with anything more
technologically adva
On Tue 26 Apr 2016 at 01:21:00 (+0100), Wols Lists wrote:
> On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote:
> > But I see you've now acknowledged (indirectly) that LP can set
> > multiple marks at the same point after stating that it can't.
> > Are there other things that LP can be persuaded to do itself th
> > But I could not get it to move down onto the staff. As described in
> >
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/formatting-text#text-alignment
> > "Vertical alignment is a bit more complex. As stated above, markup
objects
> > can be moved as a whole; however, it is also possib
On Thu 28 Apr 2016 at 13:56:03 (+0100), Anthonys Lists wrote:
> On 27/04/2016 01:04, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >On 4/26/16 3:56 PM, "Thomas Morley" wrote:
> >
> >>2016-04-26 2:21 GMT+02:00 Wols Lists :
> >>>On 25/04/16 05:31, David Wright wrote:
> (I still don't know what you're trying to accompl
Op Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:45:41 +0600
Henning Hraban Ramm schreef:
> I started working on the German translation (see attached), but can
> proceed only next week. In case someone else is working on that,
> please let me know - we can at least proofread each other.
Thanks!
> Did you consider using
2016-05-02 10:20 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn :
> Hi list,
>
> the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the f'
> wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug? Any ideas
> for a workaround?
>
> %%%
> \version "2.19.40" % 2.18.2 and earlier
> \language "d
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 10:38:55 (+0200), Malte Meyn wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> >But it's no surprise that composing directly into LP is only really
> >possible in absolute mode.
>
> It’s not. I’ve always done it in \relative mode using octave checks,
> I never had any p
On Sat 30 Apr 2016 at 09:22:14 (+0200), Noeck wrote:
> Am 30.04.2016 um 05:43 schrieb David Wright:
> > it would be great
> > if it could convert into a canonical style, where canonical could be
> > defined in ways such as: every note with pitch&duration; duration (or
> > even pitch) on only the fi
Hey Urs,
I'm willing to review the book. I'm a programmer with very good scheme/lisp
knowledge and I've been using lilypond for a number of years. I've written
some lilypond scheme functions but not that much. Let me know if I can be
of help.
Cheers,
Immanuel
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Urs L
I'm very much interested.
g.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Scheme-book-p-review-tp190300p190307.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hello Kieren,
I’ve been looking forward to reading such a book so yes, I’m interested in
proof-reading it!
JM
> Le 2 mai 2016 à 15:32, Kieren MacMillan a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Urs,
>
> Oh my goodness, yes… I am the perfect candidate for this, I think. =)
>
> Please send/link.
>
> Thanks,
> Ki
Hi Urs,
Oh my goodness, yes… I am the perfect candidate for this, I think. =)
Please send/link.
Thanks,
Kieren.
On May 2, 2016, at 5:27 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> preparing a course I'm going to give in June and July turned into a
> substantial task: I'm ending up writing the book t
Am 02.05.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Malte Meyn:
> Hi list,
>
> the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the
> f' wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug?
I would say it is a bug, the tie should know where its ending note is.
> Any ideas for a workar
Hi all,
preparing a course I'm going to give in June and July turned into a
substantial task: I'm ending up writing the book that *I* would have
needed some years ago. Basically what I'm trying to do is give readers a
chance to properly understand how Scheme can basically be used in
LilyPond. It's
Hi list,
the tie from the f' in the following code goes too far right as if the
f' wasn’t shifted because of the g' (see attachment). Is this a bug? Any
ideas for a workaround?
%%%
\version "2.19.40" % 2.18.2 and earlier
\language "deutsch"
\relative {
\set tieWaitForNote = ##t
\
16 matches
Mail list logo
