On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 6:21 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> I've moved all development of this to a GitHub repository here:
> https://github.com/davidnalesnik/lilypond-roman-numeral-tool. There are
> significant improvements over what you'll find in the archives. Ability to
> do altered figures i
Hi Ferdinand,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ferdinand Grau wrote:
> The problem is that I severely lack the ability to typest chords like the
> ones in the attachment: II6/5/♭, II7/♭5, etc. Interestingly enough,
> arbitrary number of inversion digits was supported by earlier version of
> \rN (
The problem is that I severely lack the ability to typest chords like the
ones in the attachment: II6/5/♭, II7/♭5, etc. Interestingly enough,
arbitrary number of inversion digits was supported by earlier version of
\rN (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-11/msg00470.html).
but it
2015-12-09 17:17 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2015-12-09 15:19 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
This whole stuff looks quite obfuscated to me.
Currently we do a lot of calculation to end up with then hard-coded
vectors.
Why not
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Barker [mailto:b.m.bar...@btinternet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 4:46 PM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Subject: Re: Can't access LinuxAudio server
>
> At 21:11 09/12/2015 +, you wrote:
> >Whenever I try to access any page in the linuxaudio.org
Daniel Rosen writes:
> Hello all,
>
> Whenever I try to access any page in the linuxaudio.org domain
> (including pages in download.linuxaudio.org), my browser (Firefox)
> returns a "Server not found" error, which makes it impossible for me
> to download the latest version of LilyPond for Windows
Thanks David, cheers!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/recent-modifications-to-partcombine-tp184608p184614.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
Gilberto Agostinho writes:
> I see on the documentation that the command \partcombineApartOnce
> isn't listed any more, and that is has been substituted \once
> \partcombineApart. As much as I think this new command is much more
> logical, wouldn't it be reasonable to still allow the ...Once com
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:05:11 +0100
From: Luca Danieli
Hello everybody,
I found out very few about arrows down and up for microtonal notation.Neither a
quick research on the mailing-list has shown many results.
I found the best example of it in the following page but I hoped to find some
mor
Hi Urs,
Urs Liska wrote
> But it does so after running convert-ly on the code (apart from the
> erroneous "=" before \partcombine).
Oh, of course you are right, I completely forgot about convert-ly! My bad...
So we can completely ignore my previous post, except perhaps about that
phrase in the
Am 09.12.2015 um 22:06 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems that a recent modification to \partcombine has cause a major
> problem with some older scores. The code below compiles on version 2.19.28
> but not on version 2.19.32:
...
But it does so after running convert-ly on the cod
Hello all,
Whenever I try to access any page in the linuxaudio.org domain (including pages
in download.linuxaudio.org), my browser (Firefox) returns a "Server not found"
error, which makes it impossible for me to download the latest version of
LilyPond for Windows. http://isup.me tells me that
Hi all,
It seems that a recent modification to \partcombine has cause a major
problem with some older scores. The code below compiles on version 2.19.28
but not on version 2.19.32:
%%
A = {
\repeat unfold 4 {c' d' e' f'}
}
B = {
c' d' e' f'
\partcombineApart
c' d' e' f'
Am 09.12.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>> Hi Urs,
>>
>>> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
>>> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
>> Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best opti
On 09.12.2015 17:07, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Urs,
It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
It’s possible to wrap into a music function to deal with
Hi all,
On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Why not
> \set Score.markFormat = \markup \circle \bold \markletter \etc
Gosh, that’s pretty!
(At least relatively speaking.)
Cheers,
Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.i
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-12-09 15:19 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> This whole stuff looks quite obfuscated to me.
>>> Currently we do a lot of calculation to end up with then hard-coded vectors.
>>> Why not give the initial value directly?
>>> Below three suggesti
Hi Urs,
> It is surprising that LilyPond makes it that hard to move a
> single note that doesn't have any dependencies …
Is this maybe a case where #'extra-offset is your [current] best option?
Of course, I don’t love it… but I don’t shy away from using it [via the
edition-engraver] when absolut
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:16:37 +0100
Thomas Morley wrote:
> This whole stuff looks quite obfuscated to me.
Aren't we just looking for \mark \locase \default?
I can think of many other purposes for \locase \upcase \titlecase ...
-- Johan
___
lilypond
2015-12-09 15:19 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> This whole stuff looks quite obfuscated to me.
>> Currently we do a lot of calculation to end up with then hard-coded vectors.
>> Why not give the initial value directly?
>> Below three suggestions, via string, char-set, vecto
Thomas Morley writes:
> This whole stuff looks quite obfuscated to me.
> Currently we do a lot of calculation to end up with then hard-coded vectors.
> Why not give the initial value directly?
> Below three suggestions, via string, char-set, vector.
> Maybe we could even introduce a context-prope
2015-12-09 12:52 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bernard :
> Hi Abraham,
>
> Well, as a very quick hack, you can change the uppercase hardwired A in this
> code to lowercase hardwired as below. I am not suggesting this is the best
> solution, but it works.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> — snip
>
> define-markup-commands.scm
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: custom right-hand fingering
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Thomas Morley"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2
Hi Abraham,
Well, as a very quick hack, you can change the uppercase hardwired A in this
code to lowercase hardwired as below. I am not suggesting this is the best
solution, but it works.
Andrew
— snip
define-markup-commands.scm
(define number->mark-letter-vector (make-vector 25 #\a))
(d
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To: "Thomas Morley"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:47 PM
> Subject: Re: custom right-hand fingering
>
>
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Also possible:
>>>
>>> #(define (my-stroke-finger::calc-text grob
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Thomas Morley"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: custom right-hand fingering
Thomas Morley writes:
Also possible:
#(define (my-stroke-finger::calc-text grob)
(let ((event (event-cause grob)))
(or (ly:e
At 09:34 09/12/2015 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 09.12.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Brian Barker:
At 17:08 08/12/2015 -0700, Abraham Lee wrote:
I am trying to figure out how to make rehearsal mark letters be
their lower-case counterparts. I've read through all the options
in "scm/translation-functions.
Am 09.12.2015 um 08:57 schrieb Brian Barker:
> At 17:08 08/12/2015 -0700, Abraham Lee wrote:
>> I am trying to figure out how to make rehearsal mark letters be their
>> lower-case counterparts. I've read through all the options in
>> "scm/translation-functions.scm" to see what's currently availab
28 matches
Mail list logo
