Oops, sent instead of saved ...
I'll have to return to this later.
Am 2. November 2015 08:50:39 MEZ, schrieb Urs Liska :
>Hi Craig,
>
>actually I see there's nothing *I* have to look into right now. Rather
>you should tell me what you would like to achieve. Tell me what - from
>your experience wi
Hi Craig,
actually I see there's nothing *I* have to look into right now. Rather
you should tell me what you would like to achieve. Tell me what - from
your experience with an actual project - would be good to have in
ScholarLY. While not exactly rich in time I'm more than ready to bring
this pack
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 21:27:52 +
Alberto Simões wrote:
> If you are willing to help, you do not need to mess with the lilypond
> code. You can just annotate somehow the PDF, and I'll fix the code.
Small nitpick: *you* did the transcribing, LilyPond did the typesetting.
"Transcribed with LilyPo
Hey all,
I have a piece that, due to its rhythmic complexity, needs a lot of cues in
the parts. Unfortunately, as a result, several of the parts have three
pages of consecutive music where LilyPond can't put a page turn. Is there a
setting somewhere I can use to tell the page turn engraver that it
Hi Noeck,
What was the range of ages in the auditorium and their (musical)
background?
Students were from 7 to 18 years old. Average age was around 9. All
these students globally started learning music at age 6 or 7. In most
french conservatories, students have both an instrument course and
Peter Reid writes:
> That works for me and is simpler than the solution that I posted previously.
>
> I also need to cancel the effect of the command later on. I assumed I
> just had to add :
> \revert Staff.VerticalAxisGroup.remove-empty
>
> But this doesn't seem to have any effect.
An overri
On 01.11.2015 12:59, David Kastrup wrote:
So there's not really a "best practice" but rather one that requires
least choice-making for those not interested in making more choices than
necessary.
It’s also the one with the least superficial elements, in other words:
least to type.
Yours, Simo
Hello
Just finished a transcription of a simple piece (four pages, for piano).
I took all my care to correctly transcribe it, but I would love if
someone could help proofreading it.
All the details are in [1] (source, pdf, lilypond).
If you are willing to help, you do not need to mess with th
That works for me and is simpler than the solution that I posted previously.
I also need to cancel the effect of the command later on. I assumed I just had
to add :
\revert Staff.VerticalAxisGroup.remove-empty
But this doesn't seem to have any effect.
Thanks again,
Peter
> Le 2015 Nov 1 à 2
Peter Reid writes:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me.
>
> I'm not sure where I need to put that. Sorry... I've tried putting it
> with my notes ; in the \score part... no luck.
>
> I get this sort of error message:
>
> Avertissement : vérification du type de propriété pour « remove
My guess would be that you have a 64-bit binary version of a utility package
that is also used (and installed) as a 32bit library by lilypond apearing
before Lilypond on the system path.
I've seen other products running into access violations like you mentioned due
to a 64-bit binary trying to
Hi all,
I have reinstalled it once again and it finally works.
Thanks!
Regards,
Brian
发自我的 iPad
> 在 2015年11月2日，上午8:25，guoguocuozuoduo 写道：
>
> Yes, I have reinstalled several times already, but the problem still appears.
>
> 发自我的 iPad
>
>>> 在 2015年11月1日，下午11:18，Nick Payne 写道：
>>>
>>> On 01
Yes, I have reinstalled several times already, but the problem still appears.
发自我的 iPad
> 在 2015年11月1日，下午11:18，Nick Payne 写道：
>
>> On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit)
>> laptop, b
>> laptop, but when I try
Thanks for your reply David,
I couldn't work out how to integrate your code into my score (I'm a beginner at
Lilypond) but I searched for it on google and found what I was looking for here
:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/override-VerticalAxisGroup-remove-empty-works-only-at-the-beginni
preid writes:
> Dear list,
>
> I'm working on a stage musical type score in which the last few bars contain
> only spoken text over rests. I am using this code :
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Staff
> \RemoveEmptyStaves
> % To use the setting globally, uncomment the follo
Dear list,
I'm working on a stage musical type score in which the last few bars contain
only spoken text over rests. I am using this code :
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\RemoveEmptyStaves
% To use the setting globally, uncomment the following line:
\override Vertica
At least, I can confirm that there must have been a change since 2.19.25:
In the docs there's a command to enumerate all available fonts:
$lilypond -dshow-available-fonts x
2.19.25 reports "Wingdings" as
family Wingdings
Wingdings:style=Regular
2.19.30 reports it as
family Wingdings
Wingdings:
Michael Gerdau writes:
> Hello lilyponders,
>
> in (very?) recent versions of the manuals I've seen notations like
> \relative { c' d e f g a b c }
> while older editions and e.g. all the templates in frescobaldi use
> \relative c' { c d e f g a b c }
>
> Obviously both produce exactly the same r
Hello lilyponders,
in (very?) recent versions of the manuals I've seen notations like
\relative { c' d e f g a b c }
while older editions and e.g. all the templates in frescobaldi use
\relative c' { c d e f g a b c }
Obviously both produce exactly the same result.
Is there something like a "best
On 2015-11-01 11:18, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64
>> bit) laptop, b
>> laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
>> \version "2.19.30"
>> \score {
>>\new Staff \relative
On 01/11/15 08:22, David Kastrup wrote:
tisimst writes:
As in
\acciacciatura s8
Or whatever the right duration is.
More like \grace s8 since \acciaccatura [sic!] adds a slur if I am not
mistaken.
Thank you all.
Although it is a bug, as someone pointed out, after we are aware it
exist
On 01/11/2015 18:02, Brian Guo wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit) laptop,
b
laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
\version "2.19.30"
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
c
}
}
Have you tried an uninstall/reinstall o
-1073741819(0xc005) means Access Violation, but we need to know a bit more
to find the culprit.
Please run LilyPond with Verbose output-V, --verbose and post the output.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage#basic-command-line-options-for-lilypond
tisimst writes:
> As in
>
> \acciacciatura s8
>
> Or whatever the right duration is.
More like \grace s8 since \acciaccatura [sic!] adds a slur if I am not
mistaken.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists
Hi,
I have just installed LilyPond version 2.19.30 on a Windows 10 (64 bit) laptop,
b
laptop, but when I try to compile a simple score, such as:
\version "2.19.30"
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
c
}
}
Everything seems to be fine up to "Converting to `document.pdf'...", but th
then I
25 matches
Mail list logo
