On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 07:51:49AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Scott writes:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote:
> >> Hear, hear!
> >>
> >> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
> >
> > Or Emacs!
>
> At the current point of time, I fi
Paul Scott writes:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote:
>> Hear, hear!
>>
>> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
>> >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
>
> Or Emacs!
At the current point of time, I find LilyPond-mode not a convincing case
for using Emacs. I am using LilyPond-mode in
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 10:00:39PM -0400, PMA wrote:
> Hear, hear!
>
> Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
> >Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
Or Emacs!
Paul
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilyp
I've been exposed to vi through work, and really failed to see the "thing"
that fuels the vi fan club. Actually I can't recall the other side of that
turf war, but I know that Notepad is not even a dream in that conflagration.
Notepad has it's limitations, but...it's predictable. At least to a b
Hear, hear!
Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Do yourself a serious favor and learn vi
Edward Ardzinski wrote:
>
> with Notepad [...]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I follow the link from brian Barker, I saw lots of entry for Oct 03.
BUT, on lilypond-user Archives I only see one entry on Oct 3 mark at 1.07 am
I receive the latest from subscription lilypond-user digest:
lilypond-user Digest, Vol 155, Issue 25
From: Brian Barker
To: Ming Tsang
Sent
On 03/10/15 06:58, Brian Barker wrote:
> At 19:30 02/10/2015 +0100, Anthony Youngman wrote:
>> At the end of the day, it's down to the conductor to make sure the
>> players know what they're doing.
>
> But surely engraved music is designed to indicate this unambiguously? If
> the conductor needs t
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 12:02 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> So here is a revised version of the TextSpanner code.
>
>
Oh *drat* Attached the wrong file. Apologies...
DN
\version "2.19"
%% Based on the rewrite of Text_spanner_engraver in
%% input/regression/scheme-text-spanner.ly
#(define (a
Martin's "\pointAndClickOff " did the trick, but "#(ly:set-option
'point-and-click #f) " was what I used to use, David.
Frescobaldi is where I'm headed. But I think an extended time using the
native tools will do me some good. Even some of my oldest files were
difficult to revise, even using th
Edward Ardzinski writes:
> 1) I was apparently following some good practices in 2.6.5, since what I've
> done in 2.18.2 has been essentially seamless. But...
>
> a) I miss my old editor, as I had a lot of code shortcuts built in it.
> Still, I had not updated it in many years, so there wa
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Edward Ardzinski wrote:
4) One final thought, as my snippets/code are in purgatory - what's the code
switch at the beginning of the input file to turn off the point-n-click in
the PDF output? Thx!!!
In the source use:
\pointAndClickOff
Or on the commandline:
-dno-point-
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:59 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:49 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Horizontal_bracket_engraver achieves correct ordering of nested brackets
>> through the side-position-interface array 'side-position-elements.
>> Brackets closer to the sta
1) I was apparently following some good practices in 2.6.5, since what I've
done in 2.18.2 has been essentially seamless. But...
a) I miss my old editor, as I had a lot of code shortcuts built in it.
Still, I had not updated it in many years, so there was an ancillary text
file of snippe
I think this got lost in the ether earlier in the week when the lists
were down, but someone might find the attached solution helpful. It is
good enough for my purposes. Grateful acknowledgments to Pierre
Perol-Schneider, Frank Z., and Urs Liska, all of whom unknowingly helped
with the solution.
Il giorno sab 3 ott 2015 alle 15:29, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
I think the TabStaff should accept quarter tones, etc, otherwise
quarter tone bendings will not be possible to print.
I had some privat mails about this with Federico, he may put up a pull
request at openlilylib.
I think that I'll
Sorry, than there is no need for me to make noise ...
On 03.10.2015 16:26, Brian Barker wrote:
The enquirer's code works exactly as she wishes;
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
At 15:43 03/10/2015 +0200, Bonly Bonly wrote:
As you correctly found out, as a matter of fact line breaks will not
work in your code. As I did a lot of programming in the past I do
not think that is wrong but usually a rule in such code
arrangements. Another point is the comment mark "%" that i
As you correctly found out, as a matter of fact line breaks will not
work in your code. As I did a lot of programming in the past I do not
think that is wrong but usually a rule in such code arrangements.
Another point is the comment mark "%" that invalidates the rest of the
line CR etc. includ
2015-10-03 14:45 GMT+02:00 BB :
> Some time ago thankfully I got a code to use English language in arabic
> sheet music instead of italian from Harm (Thomas Morley).
Well, all I did was making the TabStaff display things like "½", etc.
> (I think he
> offered the code free for public use? See:
>
At 15:01 03/10/2015 +0200, Bonly Bonly wrote:
There are lots of "%", say comments, that validate the rest of the
line including braces.
\markup { \column
{
\fill-line { \large \bold \title } % title
\fill-line { \titleb }
\fill-line { \caps \piece \caps \composer }
\fill-line { \meter \arranger
There are lots of "%", say comments, that validate the rest of the line
including braces.
\markup { \column
{
\fill-line { \large \bold \title } % title
\fill-line { \titleb }
\fill-line { \caps \piece \caps \composer }
\fill-line { \meter \arranger }
}
}
On 03.10.2015 14:53, Brian Bar
At 13:41 03/10/2015 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
On 02.10.2015 18:29, Karen Billings wrote:
Lilypond incorporates the "meter" but ignores the "arranger"...
I suspect that the preceding line has a non-standard line ending,
most likely just a CR or the line being wrapped by spaces rather
than a
Some time ago thankfully I got a code to use English language in arabic
sheet music instead of italian from Harm (Thomas Morley). (I think he
offered the code free for public use? See:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg103827.html )
I added the code from the description of t
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this question, but I'll post it
anyway. I think it has more to do with music notation in general, but after
reading a couple of threads, I'm confident some of you would be able to
answer the following question about the use of ties or voices.
I'm copying
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 02.10.2015 18:29, Karen Billings wrote:
>> Lilypond incorporates the "meter" but ignores the "arranger"...
>
> Can’t confirm that either on 2.18. If you’re still having the problem,
> then please post a complete compilable file as attachment for further
"Attachment" b
I've tried a couple of these solutions and it the tie displays nicely
now. Thanks!
I got a related questions about ties and using multiple voices, but I'll
post that one in a new separate thread.
2015-10-02 21:14 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2015-10-02 20:10 GMT+02:00 Malte Meyn :
> >
> >
> > Am
That's a message from your browser, and is probably half true: it's not
commonly downloaded because it is quite new. Nothing we can do. You can
ignore it.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: MING TSANG
To: Lilypond-user Mailinglist
Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2015 2:
On 02.10.2015 18:29, Karen Billings wrote:
Lilypond incorporates the "meter" but ignores the "arranger"...
Can’t confirm that either on 2.18. If you’re still having the problem,
then please post a complete compilable file as attachment for further
checking.
One more point: I think I can ima
Hi list,
I searched the list for a solution but haven’t found one yet. Is there a
possibility to have \partcombine combine identical dynamics even when
there are automatic or forced polyphonic sections? I’ve tried different
things (see attached .ly). I don’t want to simply omit the dynamic of
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:47 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > > Would this be understood by the average musician?
> > > >
> > > >|: fixed part 1 |1 alterrnative 1 |2 alternative 2 | fixed
> part 2 :|
> > >
> > > Understood? Well "my" attached "partial solution" (which I've
> > > completed only
Hello,
I’ve sometimes played scores with « 1st time only » and « 2nd time only » in
such cases.
Is that often used by professional engravers?
JM
> Le 2 oct. 2015 à 20:27, David Wright a écrit :
>
> Quoting Johan Vromans (jvrom...@squirrel.nl):
>> On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:41:21 +0100
>> Anthonys
32 matches
Mail list logo
