Is there a way to be able to have non-contiguous page numbering for bookparts
in a lilypond file? Say I have pages 1-10 in the first bookpart, but would like
30-40 in the second bookpart, can this be done?
I tried setting the first-page-number in the second book part paper block but
this has no
Ha! Very interesting. Thanks!!
Bruno
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:42 PM, tisimst wrote:
> Bruno,
>
>
> On 8/12/2015 6:07 PM, Bruno Ruviaro [via Lilypond] wrote:
>
> Hi
> all
> ,
>
>
> Is there a simpler way to extend an ottava bracket a bit to the left?
>
> In the snippet below, the first bar
Bruno,
On 8/12/2015 6:07 PM, Bruno Ruviaro [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Hi
> all
> ,
>
>
> Is there a simpler way to extend an ottava bracket a bit to the left?
>
> In the snippet below, the first bar is the default p
> lacement with no tweaks
> . The second bar achieves what I want by adapting
Hi
all
,
Is there a simpler way to extend an ottava bracket a bit to the left?
In the snippet below, the first bar is the default p
lacement with no tweaks
. The second bar achieves what I want by adapting the example "Modifying
the Ottava spanner slope"
from the documentation. Is it an
I do occasionally glance at the dev list, but to be honest, I only scan the
message subjects, and then bulk mark as read.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.08.2015 um 16:18 schrieb tisimst:
> > I just thought I'd ask since your message implies it, but do you still
> >
> On 12 Aug 2015, at 15:54, BB wrote:
>
> I tried to to rivet on differences in turkish/arab way of noatation, but I am
> sure I missed the point.
> For someone interested, here is a much better (short) description:
>
> http://www.oud.eclipse.co.uk/notation.html
For Arab maqam, there is
htt
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:23 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
>>
>> I'm still not happy with the example, because the second stencil, the
>> circle, is centered already.
Ah, right, so your two squares example is better than the circle one. Lets use
it for the LSR snippet.
>> As a thought I extended the
Am 12.08.2015 um 16:18 schrieb tisimst:
> I just thought I'd ask since your message implies it, but do you still
> plan on following the "dev" list?
This is a question that came to my mind also, but maybe it should better
be posted on the -dev list ;-)
Urs
_
On 8/12/2015 3:43 AM, hanwenn [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I haven't been reading the users list for quite a while now, and to
> simplify my life, I am going to unsubscribe from the users and bug
> list. If you need my input on anything lilypond related, please send a
> message to me dir
I tried to to rivet on differences in turkish/arab way of noatation, but
I am sure I missed the point.
For someone interested, here is a much better (short) description:
http://www.oud.eclipse.co.uk/notation.html
Important to notice to avoid mail storms about more or less cents:
... the symbol
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I haven't been reading the users list for quite a while now, and to
> simplify my life, I am going to unsubscribe from the users and bug list.
>
Hi, Han-Wen and everyone else -
Wow! End of an era. I am grateful to you for a
Solved. If one adds \voiceThree for the new voice for the tuplet 3/1, the
beaming all works as expected.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>Thank you very much for your Help with your code! Your code works
fine, here is an example code:
oud = \stringTuning < f a d' g' c'' f'' >
% https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rast_%28maqam%29
RastC = {
\relative c'
{
c d eqf f g a bqf c |
c d eqf f g a bqf c |
}
%\break
}
<<
\new St
Here, if I use ordinary notes instead of grace notes, with proportional
notation enabled, the beaming produces notes in the wrong order. So, this
example, in which I have finally been able to prod the issue into appearing,
grace notes don’t actually come into it, they are all plain ordinary musi
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hi Maite,
>
> Good suggestion. This is in fact exactly what I have been doing until
> now - including using the terrific slash function, thanks
> Ponderers!. But for some reason in my massively complex score which
> depends heavily on proportional notation, the beaming in
Hi Maite,
Good suggestion. This is in fact exactly what I have been doing until now -
including using the terrific slash function, thanks Ponderers!. But for some
reason in my massively complex score which depends heavily on proportional
notation, the beaming in this bar, at least under 2.19.25
Hi Harm,
User specification of input only guessed at by me. :-)
Of course, for negative and positive input (e.g. -3/2):
(define (mixed-num x)
(let* ((n (numerator x))
(d (denominator x)))
(cons (truncate (/ n d)) (abs (/ (remainder n d) d)
But are you sayin
Hi guys,
I haven't been reading the users list for quite a while now, and to
simplify my life, I am going to unsubscribe from the users and bug list. If
you need my input on anything lilypond related, please send a message to me
directly.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanw...@gmail.com - http://www.xs4a
Andrew Bernard writes:
> Hello Ponderers,
>
> My score has many places where a beamed set of grace notes start precisely on
> a note in a voice, and consequently overlap the first starting note. This is
> fine, and what the composer specifically intends (common notation in the New
> Complexity
Am 12.08.2015 um 08:13 schrieb Andrew Bernard:
In my example, I can’t get the start of the grace to sit on top of the note in
the other voice. Indeed, lilypond is being very excellent about avoiding a
collision, but I want to persuade it to align. I can achieve this with normal
notes, but no
20 matches
Mail list logo
