Re: How to combine staccatissimo signs with tremolo repeats

Indeed, awesomenessplus is the right level. Marvelissimo also. Thanks!! Regards, Wim. > On 1 Jul 2015, at 18:39 , tisimst wrote: > > Harm, > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Morley-2 [via Lilypond] <[hidden > email] > wrote: > 2015-07-01 13:32 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik <[hidden ema

Re: How to combine staccatissimo signs with tremolo repeats

Harm, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Thomas Morley-2 [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n178375...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > 2015-07-01 13:32 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik <[hidden email] > >: > > > Hi Wim, > > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Wim

Re: Partial Bars

Hi to all, I have received many replies to my question. Thank you all for the help. The problem is solved. Bill On 15-06-30 08:56 PM, William Marchant wrote: Hi, I am making a copy of Beethoven's Little Menuet in G. Each of the four parts begins with a partial bar. The barcheck failure wa

Re: How to combine staccatissimo signs with tremolo repeats

2015-07-01 13:32 GMT+02:00 David Nalesnik : > Hi Wim, > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: >> >> I'm trying to combine the staccatissimo sign(s) (as generated with the -! >> articuulation) with a tremolo repeat (with the g2:8 notation). > > > Possibly you could do something

Re: How to combine staccatissimo signs with tremolo repeats

Hi Wim, On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:18 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: > I'm trying to combine the staccatissimo sign(s) (as generated with the -! > articuulation) with a tremolo repeat (with the g2:8 notation). > Possibly you could do something with this snippet: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=77

How to combine staccatissimo signs with tremolo repeats

I'm trying to combine the staccatissimo sign(s) (as generated with the -! articuulation) with a tremolo repeat (with the g2:8 notation). Attached a .PNG file illustrating what I want tp produce. Is this possible? Regards, Wim. Regards, Wim.

Re: Partial Bars

Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > Hi Bill, > > here's how I'd do: [...] In this example you can just throw out anything timing-related, remove those bar checks which you placed after artificially shortened bars, and the file will compile fine as of version 2.19.1. Making LilyPond understand the