i switched to 2.19.21 and the parenthesis collide with the stem of the
previous note.
see http://lilybin.com/fy9guz/4
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/collision-parenthesize-and-sharp-symbol-tp178004p178036.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at N
2015-06-20 12:07 GMT+02:00 Robin Bannister :
> Nathan Ho wrote:
>
>> % And, of course, the slur's too short vertically
>
>
> Adjust 0.3 to taste:
>
> \override Staff.Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob)
> (interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.3))
or:
\once \offset positions #'
rsfjr wrote:
It keeps throwing an error message
Well, tell us some more ...
- what message
- with what lilypond version
But preferably, send a small .ly file which has this problem.
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
Thank you all,
It keeps throwing an error message, when I use these:
\override Staff.Arpeggio.stencil = #ly:arpeggio::brew-chord-slur
\override Staff.Arpeggio.X-extent = #ly:grob::stencil-width
Without those the arpeggios are slurred, but with the arpeggio symbol.
I believe the Lilypond docu
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Burfitt"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with tied chords in TAB
"Phil Burfitt" writes:
In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the
chord, shows up in the tied chord.
Which
"Phil Burfitt" writes:
> In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the
> chord, shows up in the tied chord.
>
> Which g shows up depends on whether I retype the tied chord (bar 1),
> use the 'q' symbol (bar 2), or use 'q' with \tabChordRepeats set (bar
> 3).
>
>
> \version "2.
In the following minimal tablature example, the repeated g in the chord,
shows up in the tied chord.
Which g shows up depends on whether I retype the tied chord (bar 1), use the
'q' symbol (bar 2), or use 'q' with \tabChordRepeats set (bar 3).
\version "2.18.2"
\score {
\new TabStaff {
On 2015-06-19 23:25, tisimst wrote:
Kaj,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:05 PM, 70147persson [via Lilypond] <[hidden
email] > wrote:
However, when I should apply this on my real score, I stumbled
over a new issue. I had not mentioned this, as I was not aware of
it being a problem. How c
Am 20.06.2015 um 12:15 schrieb Klaus Blum:
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
{
b'8\stemDown a'' g'' b'\stemUp
}
– however, it doesn’t work… (Why?)
Hi Simon,
just put \stemDown and \stemUp *before* the note:
Silly me… it was too late at night :-)
Best regards, Simon
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your reply.
To say the truth, I'm under situation that
I can't access the setting of paper size,
so I can't put tag to stand for paper width.
I'd like to expect a way with scheme.
I've tried like as:
\shape #((if (= paper-width 210 mm)
'(( ...points for
Am 20.06.2015 um 10:25 schrieb Venus' Wink:
Hi All,
Would you see the following to codes?
http://lilybin.com/57gfma/2
http://lilybin.com/57gfma/3
The paper widths, and according to them,
the lists of control points for slurs
differ between these examples.
I'd like to switch the con
Nathan Ho wrote:
% And, of course, the slur's too short vertically
Adjust 0.3 to taste:
\override Staff.Arpeggio #'positions = #(lambda (grob)
(interval-widen (ly:arpeggio::calc-positions grob) 0.3))
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote
> {
>b'8\stemDown a'' g'' b'\stemUp
> }
>
> – however, it doesn’t work… (Why?)
Hi Simon,
just put \stemDown and \stemUp *before* the note:
{
\stemDown b'8a'' g'' \stemUp b'
}
Cheers,
Klaus
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.c
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:48 PM, rsfjr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to overcome an issue. I need to place some slurs in a
> polyphonic
> pair, connecting the noteheads. Is there any workaround?
>
Hi rsfjr,
LilyPond doesn't support vertical slurs. What you're looking for is
\arpeggioParenthe
Hi All,
Would you see the following to codes?
http://lilybin.com/57gfma/2
http://lilybin.com/57gfma/3
The paper widths, and according to them,
the lists of control points for slurs
differ between these examples.
I'd like to switch the control points
on the paper size in one code as:
15 matches
Mail list logo