Am 04.12.2014 um 07:03 schrieb Jaime E Oliver:
Dear All,
I am getting the following error:
Error: programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
I vaguely remember having run into the same problem.
Glissandi aren't breakable by default, so you have to explicitly allow a
break here:
Dear All,
I am getting the following error:
Error: programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
in a passage that contains glissandos and glissando spans that go over the bar
line in all bars… so instead of breaking the glissando and continuing it in the
next line it just keeps wr
Am 03.12.2014 22:31, schrieb Big Noise:
Hi everybody,
now I could finish two scores that have been waiting for that colored
background trick. Maybe they are somewhat extreme examples...
If anyone is interested:
http://jkg-musik.jimdo.com/lilypond
This is absolutely great!
I think this would
Did you include:
\language "english"
I feel like I see errors like that when I forget to set the language.
HTH,
Abraham
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Guy Stalnaker-2 [via Lilypond]
> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm seeing this in the lilypond output log:
>
>
> Processing
The situation is as follows. A pipe tune made up of two parts where each part
is repeated once. The first part has an alternative ending when played the
second time. This appears on a shortened line of its own. The second part
also has an alternative ending when play the second time and this matche
All,
I'm seeing this in the lilypond output log:
Processing
`C:/Users/jstalnak/Dropbox/Documents/Compositions/LordsPrayerDuet/LordsPrayerDuet.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...[8][16][24]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: Object is not a markup.
continuing, cross fingers
Hi everybody,
now I could finish two scores that have been waiting for that colored
background trick. Maybe they are somewhat extreme examples...
If anyone is interested:
http://jkg-musik.jimdo.com/lilypond
For the colored arrows from the second example, I've created a snippet
as well:
http:
Hello all,
I just would like to make one more little comment about this post of mine:
after reading an e-mail sent by one user asking me what's the big deal with
this library of mine and why do I use Fortran instead of typing these scores
of mine directly in LilyPond, I realized that I may have be
Hi Kieren
I'm glad you find it useful. One of the main drivers for me was just to dip my
toes into the wonderful world of Scheme (still not up
to the ankles yet!)
You could try it out by either saving the file in your includes folder and
calling it (see below) by \naturalizeMusic in the score
f
Am 03.12.2014 18:10, schrieb Joshua Nichols:
> For finer control, you'll likely want to use Janek's amazing \shape
function(s).
Yes, This is very good, but I only think it works for single slurs and
ties? I'm looking for something that can deal with individual ties in
a single chord.
I don
> For finer control, you’ll likely want to use Janek’s amazing \shape
function(s).
Yes, This is very good, but I only think it works for single slurs and
ties? I'm looking for something that can deal with individual ties in a
single chord.
IC,
Josh
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Kieren MacMil
Hi Josh,
> I'm typesetting some Rachmaninoff (G-flat prelude) and I'm running into a
> hairy situation. See attached.
> Any way to fix this problem? I have tried changing the default spacing, but
> it's still the same problem - two itty-bitty ties.
\relative c' {
\stemDown
\once \override T
Am 03.12.2014 17:40, schrieb Joshua Nichols:
I'm typesetting some Rachmaninoff (G-flat prelude) and I'm running
into a hairy situation. See attached.
Any way to fix this problem? I have tried changing the default
spacing, but it's still the same problem - two itty-bitty ties.
First thing is
I'm typesetting some Rachmaninoff (G-flat prelude) and I'm running into a
hairy situation. See attached.
Any way to fix this problem? I have tried changing the default spacing, but
it's still the same problem - two itty-bitty ties.
Snippet -
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c' { \stemDown \tieDown
[Resending to lilypond-user, since the issue might be interesting to
more people...]
What defines the distance between a time signature and the next note
*with an accidental* (in addition to the TimeSignatures
`extra-spacing-width')? I would expect that the `first-note' (or
`next-note', if set)
Hi Peter,
> Yes it will force accidentals to be same type as key signature. Music in Keys
> with flats will only have flat accidentals and similar
> for sharp keys just sharp accidentals.
Ah! That is a nice feature.
Perhaps there’s a way (e.g., with David N.) to combine the two functions into a
Hi Kieren
Yes it will force accidentals to be same type as key signature. Music in Keys
with flats will only have flat accidentals and similar
for sharp keys just sharp accidentals.
Now I don't imagine this has general use but it was a first exercise in using
scheme to interact with LilyPond.
David
Ah so, the passage was taken as a test and was modified to include double
sharps etc. I don't pretend that Lilypond transposition
produced anything so horrible.
This was my first attempt at scheme coding - so some of it could well be
improved.
The notes file was
\version "2.18.2"
%
> Arpeggio travels to the left and dot disappears with \harmonic (2 items).
Thank you both kindly for your answers, very useful!
Peter
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
19 matches
Mail list logo
