Re: Barline at beginning of lines of music.

Am 15.07.2014 16:14, schrieb Richard Shann: Well, I'm not sure I follow the distinction between defined bar-types and not, this code \version "2.18.0" \defineBarLine ":" #'(":" ":" ":") \defineBarLine "|" #'(":" ":" ":") \score { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = "RH" <<

Re: Repeat volta not at beginning of piece doesn't get initial repeat bar line

2014-07-15 20:08 GMT+02:00 John McWilliam : > Thanks Thomas for your input. I have applied your first alternative - the > > simpler one - to a four part piece. This is the classical length of a > > march in piping. The enclosed snippet illustrates the result. The end of > > the first part looses it

Re: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

Very nice, Kieren! But still there are some issues: 1) place the first \mark at the begin and you'll get an error: programming error: cyclic chain in pure-Y-offset callbacks 2) Take a look at this example: %%% \version "2.19.10" \layout { \context { \type "Engraver_gro

Re: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

"Karol Majewski" writes: > Hi, > > I'm having a hard time trying put all RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal > line. This is an example: > > %% > > \version "2.19.10" > > global = { > \time 3/4 \tempo "Allegro" s1*3/4*2 > } > > part = { > \clef treble > c'4 \

Re: Repeat volta not at beginning of piece doesn't get initial repeat bar line

Marc Hohl wrote > Looks nice! Do you think that \setRepeatCommand should be included in > the sources? I'd always found the manual tweaking of the text in the > volta brackets somewhat clumsy... Or at least it could be added to the LSR? -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond

Re: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

Hi Karol, > I tried to define new context, but with no success. It would help if you included a minimal code example, so we could diagnose the problem. This does what you want, I think: \version "2.19.10" \layout { \context { \type "Engraver_group" \name ScoreMarks \consists "Staff_

Re: Repeat volta not at beginning of piece doesn't get initial repeat bar line

Thanks Thomas for your input. I have applied your first alternative - the simpler one - to a four part piece. This is the classical length of a march in piping. The enclosed snippet illustrates the result. The end of the first part looses its repeat barline. I have tried introducing a \bar

Re: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

> > See Vertical collision avoidance in the NR: > > \score { > \new Staff << > \override Score.RehearsalMark.outside-staff-priority = #0 > \global > \part > >> > } > Hi Phil, I tried that before, but this solution has one drawback: rehearsal marks are _below_ tempo marks. And I want to place t

Re: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

- Original Message - From: "Karol Majewski" To: "lilypond-user" Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 6:03 PM Subject: How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line? Hi, I'm having a hard time trying put all RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line. This is an example: %%%

How to put RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line?

Hi, I'm having a hard time trying put all RehearsalMarks on their own horizontal line. This is an example: %% \version "2.19.10" global = { \time 3/4 \tempo "Allegro" s1*3/4*2 } part = { \clef treble c'4 \mark \default d'4 e'4 c'4 \mark \default d'4 e'4 }

Re: [openlilylib] documentation browser and generator (start)

Urs Liska wrote > - generate HTML documentation for the library > - browse the library by snippet name, category, tag, author (and > possibly more options in the future) > - display documentation for a selected snippet (built on-the-fly from > the actual snippet) Hi Urs, Wow, looking good!

Re: Suggestion for improvement

On 07/15/2014 04:19 PM, Alexander Kobel wrote: Fortunately, other readers exist which don't lock the file and even take notice of file updates automagically. SumatraPDF [2] is the one recommended most often. Oh, and if you don't desperately need a bunch of buttons to click on, check out if th

Re: Suggestion for improvement

On 07/15/2014 04:30 PM, Knute Snortum wrote: Is there an OS-agnostic way of checking if the PDF is locked and issuing a more user-friendly message? I assume so, yes; but judging from the error message, you'd rather have to ask the GhostScript people to add it. IMHO it makes sense for LilyPon

Re: Suggestion for improvement

Is there an OS-agnostic way of checking if the PDF is locked and issuing a more user-friendly message? Knute Snortum (via Gmail) On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote: > On 07/15/2014 04:19 PM, Alexander Kobel wrote: > >> Fortunately, other readers exist which don't lock the

Re: Suggestion for improvement

On 07/15/2014 03:58 PM, Urs Liska wrote: Am 15.07.2014 15:56, schrieb Knute Snortum: Any other thoughts? Nothing constructive, only the observation (for the record) that this is a Windows-only issue. Just for the record, it's not a Windows issue rather than an Adobe-Reader-on-Windows issue

Re: Spanner.center.text property?

Hi David et al., I’ve been out of the loop/Pond recently… what’s the current status on “measure-attached spanners”? I’m trying to get my musicals/* code base ready to donate to openlilylib, and would love to have this in th

Re: Suggestion for improvement

Am 15.07.2014 15:56, schrieb Knute Snortum: Any other thoughts? Nothing constructive, only the observation (for the record) that this is a Windows-only issue. Urs ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/l

Suggestion for improvement

This isn't a bug, so I wanted to post it here first -- see what other people think. If I compile a PDF with LilyPond and open it with Adobe Reader, then run LilyPond again, I get this error: Converting to `./pictures-at-an-exhibition-all.pdf'... warning: `(gs -q -dNOSAFER -dDEV

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

Hi David, David Nalesnik-2 wrote > No :) (And I should probably take a lesson from some of my own music...) Same here, when I first saw your proposition I was also surprised with the default behaviour of LilyPond, but then by checking some of my own scores for the "annoying repeated accidentals

Re: Score alignment

On 12 Jul 2014 10:54, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Samuel Toogood" < sam_toog...@athsoc.org.uk> > To: > Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 9:42 AM > Subject: Score alignment > > > >> Apologies for asking such a basic sounding question, but I have looked >> and looked an

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

Hi Gilberto, On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current > behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above > the accidental looks superfluou

[openlilylib] documentation browser and generator (start)

Hi all, despite the fact that I absolutely can't afford it I have started writing some stuff for a new openlilylib. As it turned out we won't have a script to (only) generate documentation for the library but rather a tool that can - generate HTML documentation for the library - browse the l

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

Hi David, Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above the accidental looks superfluous, but usually the works that really benefit from dodecaphonic-no-repeat have a much more complex musical texture

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > >> Take neo-modern and neo-modern-cautionary out of the mix. My observation > holds for neo-modern and dodecaphonic-no-repeat, which both operate at a > staff level. > *Arghh* I meant neo-modern-voice, of course. _

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, David Nalesnik wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> >> So what about >> >> { { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } } ? >> > > I think you mean > > << { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } >> > > >>

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:52 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > > So what about > > { { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } } ? > I think you mean << { fis'8 r8 r4 r4 r8 fis'8 } \\ { r8 cis'8 f' r2 } >> > Should neo-modern-voice really consider the second fis'8 a repetition of > the fi

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

David Nalesnik writes: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: guoguocuozuoduo > Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM > Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain > styles > To: David Nalesnik > > >>There should be for neo-modern, neo-modern-cautionary, ne

Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

-- Forwarded message -- From: guoguocuozuoduo Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM Subject: RE: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles To: David Nalesnik >There should be for neo-modern, neo-modern-cautionary, neo-modern-voice, neo-modern-voice-caution