On 04/07/14 07:50, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Hartmut Leister wrote:
>
>> Hello Lilypond users,
>>
>> I'm having a vertical spacing problem.
>> [2]
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-between-systems#Vertical-spacing-between-systems
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Hartmut Leister wrote:
Hello Lilypond users,
I'm having a vertical spacing problem.
[2]
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Vertical-spacing-between-systems#Vertical-spacing-between-systems
v2.12 is quite old. Vertical spacing syntax has been drast
Hi Hartmut,
2014-07-04 8:12 GMT+02:00 Hartmut Leister :
> I'm having a vertical spacing problem.
> For a simple score (see [1]) I want to increase the vertical space
> between stanza 2 and the next system (I've marked an occurence) just a
> little bit.
>
system-system-spacing #'basic-distanc
Hello Lilypond users,
I'm having a vertical spacing problem.
For a simple score (see [1]) I want to increase the vertical space
between stanza 2 and the next system (I've marked an occurence) just a
little bit.
I've looked into the documentation [2], but it doesn't seem to work.
What I don't want
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Our repository has now lived for some time, and I think it is a good thing
> to have and maintain. The recent renaming was partially intended to stress
> its nature as an _includable_ library (as opposed to the official LSR). But
> to make that wo
Well, of course this reminded me of \textLengthOff and \textLengthOn,
which normally serve to control this behaviour.
However, with packed-spacing, \textLengthOff has no effect at all, while
\textLengthOn slightly increases the spacing between notes, or basically
it seems to me that it increases
Uns Liska wrote
> I think that after an initial phase of trial & error we should
> now do it right and create a structure we can live with for the future.
Hi Urs, This is looking like an improvement to me. Here's a thought. If
the emphasis is on include-ability, what about just having all the
I really should remember to always answer to the list ...
Original Message
Subject: Re: Capped tuplet number
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 18:03:53 +0200
From: Malte Meyn
To: Javier Ruiz-Alma
Of course it is. I don’t have an exact solution but I think one could
change the TupletNumb
Hi,
I like your ideas on the wiki.
- I'd like to second especially the renaming/reodering of the
definitions file. It looks better without definition(s).ily at the end.
However, it means that the content of the library doubles (one folder
and one ily).
I am not sure, if it is a good idea, but the
Is it possible to add these caps to tuplet numbers?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
James writes:
> On 03/07/14 14:22, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>> Sir or Madam,
>>
>> This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
>> been compromised.
> No I think it that this users email address
>
> janov...@yahoo.com
>
> has been compromised, and as he is subscri
On 03/07/14 14:22, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
Sir or Madam,
This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
been compromised.
No I think it that this users email address
janov...@yahoo.com
has been compromised, and as he is subscribed to the Lilypond list (and
pro
Sir or Madam,
This e-mail arrived in my in box this morning. It appears that the list has
been compromised.
Mark Stephen Mrotek
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of
janov...@ya
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> 2014-07-02 12:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
>
>> However, this fix does not have regtests. I would appreciate it if you
>> could cook up a few short but difficult use cases for placing in the
>> regtests.
>>
>
> In order to find a sort of inspiration I've just r
Denemo version 1.1.6 has been released. There have been improvements to
the LilyPond editing which have actually been present since version
1.1.2 but I've been getting behind with announcing releases here.
Also, asked for on this list are French 18th c keyboard ornaments - full
support for creating
- Original Message -
From: "Abel Cheung"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Issue on packed-spacing?
OK, maybe it's clearer to attach image.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Abel Cheung wrote:
The artifact here is (forget the ragged-rigth typo), when using
pack
OK, maybe it's clearer to attach image.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Abel Cheung wrote:
> The artifact here is (forget the ragged-rigth typo), when using
> packed-spacing, the whole note with markup is stretched horizontally
> in an insane way to cope with the markup size, and I wonder if this
The artifact here is (forget the ragged-rigth typo), when using
packed-spacing, the whole note with markup is stretched horizontally
in an insane way to cope with the markup size, and I wonder if this is
the designed behavoir of lilypond.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 03.0
Am 03.07.2014 10:03, schrieb Abel Cheung:
Hi,
Is this the desired behavior of SpacingSpanner.packed-spacing ? (I'm
using 2.18.2)
\paper { ragged-rigth = ##t ragged-last = ##t }
\relative c' {
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'packed-spacing = ##t
c8 c c-\markup{"some very very very very ve
Hi to all interested or involved in the openlilylib (a.k.a openlilylib
snippets) repository.
Our repository has now lived for some time, and I think it is a good
thing to have and maintain. The recent renaming was partially intended
to stress its nature as an _includable_ library (as opposed t
Hi,
Is this the desired behavior of SpacingSpanner.packed-spacing ? (I'm
using 2.18.2)
\paper { ragged-rigth = ##t ragged-last = ##t }
\relative c' {
\override Score.SpacingSpanner #'packed-spacing = ##t
c8 c c-\markup{"some very very very very very very long text"} c c c c c |
\repeat unfo
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 08:57 +0200, Robert Schmaus wrote:
> If you search for "Rhythmic Slashes" within the v2.18 snippets documentation,
> you'll find another way of creating those slashes - that approach has the
> advantage that the slashes will be silent in MIDI.
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v
Thomas Morley writes:
> well, in the mentioned thread I added/changed some code, though, I'm
> not the author of the solfege-engraver.
>
> Nevertheless, I'll try to dig into it the upcoming days. Right now
> I've less, down to absolutely no time for it.
Well, for figuring out how to connect ties
Pierre Perol-Schneider writes:
> 2014-07-02 12:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
>
>> However, this fix does not have regtests. I would appreciate it if you
>> could cook up a few short but difficult use cases for placing in the
>> regtests.
>>
>
> In order to find a sort of inspiration I've just r
24 matches
Mail list logo
