Oh, thank you! There it is!
2014-05-30 23:06 GMT+02:00 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Peter Nerlich" <
> peter.nerl...@googlemail.com>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:51 PM
> Subject: Caesura missing?
>
>
> Hi there,
>> Eventually I found Lilipond and am simply exited
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Nerlich"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:51 PM
Subject: Caesura missing?
Hi there,
Eventually I found Lilipond and am simply exited about that. But now it
seems
to lack of one thing, I could not find a Caesura
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesura
> seems to lack of one thing, I could not find a Caesura
Hello, have a look on this page:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-as-curves#breath-marks
Best regards,
Stefaan.
--
http://technogems.blogspot.com
http://a-touch-of-music.blogspot.com
http://youtube.co
Hi there,
Eventually I found Lilipond and am simply exited about that. But now it seems
to lack of one thing, I could not find a Caesura
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesura). At least not in the german manual.
Of course not that important, just wanted you to now if it is really missing,
else I
MING TSANG wrote:
>
>
> I enter code one measure at a time (compile at each measure). It works
> fine until I enter bar 60 for choir-bass-clef. Bar 59 is ok. I code
> bar 60 and I got the following error. Sorry for the long attachments.
>
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.19.6 [you-are-mine.ly]..
It probably is a bug, but it's one of those unrepeatable kind that can't be
fixed until someone figures out how to make it happen consistently.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 5:11 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
> Knute:
> Thank you for the info. I did as you suggested.
> I add bar 6
Sorry Paul, I did not read the email clearly. I forgot to have the email
address to you in my previous email.
On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:11:55 AM, MING TSANG wrote:
Knute:
Thank you for the info. I did as you suggested.
I add bar 61, it fails, then I add bar 62; this time it compile. So i
Knute:
Thank you for the info. I did as you suggested.
I add bar 61, it fails, then I add bar 62; this time it compile. So it compile
for bar 63 as well.
Does this constitute a bug?
BTW can you point me to the other thread that you mention. I am interest to
read about it.
Emmanuel,
Ming.
On F
