Zitat von Keith OHara :
Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes:
Has anybody seen this before?
No. If it is Chopin, what Opus and Number is it ?
It's Leopold Godowsky's Study on Chopin's Study op. 25,11.
And, just out of curiosity, how would you do that in LilyPond?
If possible, use a m
How can I avoid the following glitch:
http://www.flight.us/misc/chart_glitch.png (the final fret chart is
misaligned, rising above the adjacent one, instead of vertically
aligning with the one on its left.)
also struggling with labelling the chords with the chord letters (A,
C#m, etc.), but
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> I think the “perfect” break-engraver would admit coding like the following
> (pseudocode; all numbers in measures):
>
> \lineBreakAt 27
> \lineBreaksAt (12 28 34 48)
> \noLineBreaks (27-30)
> \lineBreaksForbidAt 28
> \
Further to this thread…
> I just think it — or something like it — should be vetted and [the
> improved/approved version] included with the regular distro.
I think the “perfect” break-engraver would admit coding like the following
(pseudocode; all numbers in measures):
\lineBreakAt 27
Urs Liska openlilylib.org> writes:
> Has anybody seen this before?
No. If it is Chopin, what Opus and Number is it ?
> And, just out of curiosity, how would you do that in LilyPond?
If possible, use a more standard way to show whatever this means.
You can set the number of beams fairly easil
Has anybody seen this before?
And, just out of curiosity, how would you do that in LilyPond?
Urs
<>___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi David,
> A content-independent line- and page-breaking system is easy.
> The content is what makes it complicated…
Ah, the semantics cop is on the beat. ;)
Let me put it another way: Using David’s engraver (which he graciously sent me
off-list), I am happily adding manual breaks EXTERNAL TO
Dear community,
I would like to enable point and click for okular and gvim on my
ubuntu-machine.
Does someone know, how to do it?
Thanks
Stefan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi all,
>
>> How would it behave if \draftSkip were, instead of being changed,
> tagged, and you ran lilypond with exclude-tag #draft? (I can't
> remember the syntax off the top of my head, but I think that's
> reasonably close.)
>
> It would be fine… but it’s still a b
Hi all,
> How would it behave if \draftSkip were, instead of being changed, tagged, and
> you ran lilypond with exclude-tag #draft? (I can't remember the syntax off
> the top of my head, but I think that's reasonably close.)
It would be fine… but it’s still a band-aid (um, Band-Aid™) solution.
Francois Planiol writes:
> Thanks!
>
> Best would be directly in lilypond for keeping the working flow.
> I remember, but was it MusixTeX or Lilypond (?) that had a command like
> @latex{ ... here LaTeX stuff ...}
> Isnt it possible?
LilyPond does not run TeX or LaTeX as part of its operation.
Thanks!
Best would be directly in lilypond for keeping the working flow.
I remember, but was it MusixTeX or Lilypond (?) that had a command like
@latex{ ... here LaTeX stuff ...}
Isnt it possible?
About #2 solution, I suppose it will be more difficult to control the
size of the picts, and anyway
Hi David,
> By using a non-predefined name for that kind of thing.
H… I was trying that, and getting “undeclared variable” warnings.
Anyway, it seems to work now.
BEGIN SNIPPET
\version "2.17.97"
#(define-markup-command (mm-feed layout props amount) (number?)
(let ((o-s (ly:output-de
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> The wrong quotes, Sir!
>
> That was some weird email or editor translation… sorry.
>
>> Apart from that #:properties ((line-width 12)) will only use the 12 as a
>> default if it is left unspecified, and it never is unspecified. You
>> need to use a non-p
I can proofread the English version.
On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Janek Warchoł [mailto:janek.lilyp...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:58 PM
>> To: Daniel Rosen
>> Cc: LilyPond Users; Jan Nieuwenhuizen; David Kastrup
Francois Planiol writes:
> hello,
>
> I dont know how is developping for Riemann symbols right know.
> I developped this in LaTeX and this works ok for me.
> The question is how to pack it in a \markup block, using LaTeX and two
> packages.
>
> Some idea?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Francois
>
>
How would it behave if \draftSkip were, instead of being changed, tagged, and
you ran lilypond with exclude-tag #draft? (I can't remember the syntax off the
top of my head, but I think that's reasonably close.)
On Dec 27, 2013, at 1:38 AM, "Keith OHara" wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:44:56
Have you looked at lilypond-book?
On Dec 27, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Francois Planiol wrote:
> hello,
>
> I dont know how is developping for Riemann symbols right know.
> I developped this in LaTeX and this works ok for me.
> The question is how to pack it in a \markup block, using LaTeX and two
>
hello,
I dont know how is developping for Riemann symbols right know.
I developped this in LaTeX and this works ok for me.
The question is how to pack it in a \markup block, using LaTeX and two packages.
Some idea?
Thanks in advance,
Francois
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepa
Hi David,
> The wrong quotes, Sir!
That was some weird email or editor translation… sorry.
> Apart from that #:properties ((line-width 12)) will only use the 12 as a
> default if it is left unspecified, and it never is unspecified. You
> need to use a non-predefined name for that kind of thing.
Thanks Wilbert, that's very good news !
Fröhliche Weihnachten !
Pierre
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Daniel Rosen writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eluze [mailto:elu...@gmail.com]
>>
>> try it in the Staff context:
>>
>> \override Staff.TrillSpanner.to-barline = ##t
>>
>> Eluze
>
> Well, that did the trick. A couple things about this are interesting
> to me, though.
>
> First of a
> -Original Message-
> From: Janek Warchoł [mailto:janek.lilyp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:58 PM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Cc: LilyPond Users; Jan Nieuwenhuizen; David Kastrup; Urs Liska; Noeck;
> Kieren MacMillan; Joseph Wakeling; Benjamin CL; Richard Shann
> Subject: R
> -Original Message-
> From: Eluze [mailto:elu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:22 PM
> To: Daniel Rosen; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Possible bug with TrillSpanner.to-barline?
>
>
> Am 26.12.2013 22:22, schrieb Daniel Rosen:
> > In the example below, uncomment
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Vromans [mailto:jvrom...@squirrel.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 2:30 PM
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: ANN: Frescobaldi 2.0.12
>
> Wilbert Berendsen writes:
>
> > Enjoy, and please report bugs as usual!
>
> Oh, how wonderful it wo
25 matches
Mail list logo
