Re: SMuFL

>> Unicode is a *character* standard, mainly to *exchange* >> information. It is *not* related to glyphs, or to fonts. The >> SMuFL team correctly maps the glyphs to the Private Area of >> Unicode, and they don't suggest the inclusion of any of those >> entities into the Unicode standard. > > T

Re: SMuFL

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > The SMuFL standard is just a specification cooked up by Steinberg > > for the new program. It's been possible for them to consider this > > since they are architecting the program from scratch. But it's a > > step away and outside of

Re: SMuFL

> The SMuFL standard is just a specification cooked up by Steinberg > for the new program. It's been possible for them to consider this > since they are architecting the program from scratch. But it's a > step away and outside of the hugely important work the Unicode > Consortium have been doing

Re: SMuFL

Greetings List, There's an old IT joke that the beauty of having standards is that there are so many to choose from! I agree with Shane. The SMuFL standard is just a specification cooked up by Steinberg for the new program. It's been possible for them to consider this since they are architec

Re: SMuFL

SMuFL has nothing much to do with preserving the Unicode standard. If you can get the Unicode consortium to participate in outlining SMuFL stuffs in its standard than it would be good, but an abstracted standard used by one or two applications is a bad idea especially for one text based like ours.

Re: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond

- Original Message - From: "Jay Hamilton" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: ; Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:52 PM Subject: Re: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond On 2013-08-09 07:34, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013

Re: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond

On 2013-08-09 07:34, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:25 PM Subject: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond Hi- I was hoping to understand how to get PNG or something I could use in a html doc. But I don't Please point

Re: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond

- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:25 PM Subject: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond Hi- I was hoping to understand how to get PNG or something I could use in a html doc. But I don't Please point me to the most useful page in docs if po

Re: I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond

If you run lilypond -ddelete-intermediate-files --png $your-filename you will get a png file as a result. However I don't know how you can control its output size/resolution. If you run LilyPond and pass it the -dpreview option on the command line it will give you a nicely cropped pdf and png

I don't understand how to get a png file in lilypond

Hi- I was hoping to understand how to get PNG or something I could use in a html doc. But I don't Please point me to the most useful page in docs if possible. Here's the test file \version "2.16.1" \header { title = "" composer = "Jay Hamilton" copyright = \markup { \tiny \override #'(b

Re: SMuFL

Am 09.08.2013 15:58, schrieb Carl Peterson: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Urs Liska > wrote: Am 09.08.2013 15:11, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Of course I don't know that either, but I see a few steps: 1) Modify the mapping of glyphs to Unicode numbers

Re: Ossia Staves

This is much too complex for most of us to be able to help with. Could I suggest you read the section on Ossia staves in the Notation Reference: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-single-staves#ossia-staves Then try to create a minimal example based on that - I woul

Re: SMuFL

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 09.08.2013 15:11, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: > Of course I don't know that either, but I see a few steps: > 1) Modify the mapping of glyphs to Unicode numbers >I think that would be very simple, just a matter of remapping them in a > suitabl

Ossia Staves

I've been working on replicating an edition of the Fourth Concert by Georg Golterman (see attachment "fourth_concert.ly"). This particular edition requires, at the end of the first part, two smaller ossia staves that are aligned directly above their respective main staves. I've managed to successf

Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software

Am 08.08.2013 14:09, schrieb David Kastrup: Well, if enough people only slightly overstep a line, it will disappear. I think it would make sense to expand on most followup thoughts in our own blog, once they can't be expected to be of much interest to Daniel. While he will be able to answer comp

Re: SMuFL

Am 09.08.2013 15:11, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt: Am 09.08.2013 14:39, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi all, although I suspect this could once more become a longish and scattered thread, I feel forced to bring it up here. :) What do you think: would it make sense to open up LilyPond thinking to the idea o

Re: SMuFL

Am 09.08.2013 14:39, schrieb Urs Liska: Hi all, although I suspect this could once more become a longish and scattered thread, I feel forced to bring it up here. :) What do you think: would it make sense to open up LilyPond thinking to the idea of SMuFL brought up by Steinberg and Daniel Spre

SMuFL

Hi all, although I suspect this could once more become a longish and scattered thread, I feel forced to bring it up here. What do you think: would it make sense to open up LilyPond thinking to the idea of SMuFL brought up by Steinberg and Daniel Spreadbury? http://www.smufl.org