I'd like to donate on a regular basis. What's the easiest, most efficient
way to setup this via my PayPal? Send money direct to David's email, or is
there a centralized option? Sorry if this is the wrong thread to ask this
question, I just figured that it wasn't /too /far off for a tangent.
Than
David Kastrup gnu.org> writes:
> James Harkins gmail.com> writes:
> > Last week, I got a message inviting me to pay my Finale tax. I was
> > very happy to delete it, but not before a good larf.
>
> Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
> my own work is being fu
on 2013-03-24 at 23:56 Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Could i ask you to write a function that would print a red dot on top
> of a grob's refpoint? (the image i've attached was made with GIMP,
> and it would be better to have it in lily code.
hey, i was trying to find somewhere in the docs how to get
Hi all,
for the record:
Torsten from the german forum found a simple solution:
\version "2.16.2"
#(set-global-staff-size 30) % try different values
#(define-markup-command (harm-test layout props size) (number?)
(let ((pt (ly:output-def-lookup layout 'pt)))
(interpret-markup layout props
2013/3/24 Janek Warchoł :
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>> this is great!!
[...]
> Could i ask you to write a function that would print a red dot on top
> of a grob's refpoint? (the image i've attached was made with GIMP,
> and it would be better to have it in lily co
Karol-
Thank you this worked as expected.
David-
the manual for 2.16.0 page 487
\paper variables for page numbering
Default values not listed here are defined in
‘ly/paper-defaults-init.ly’
auto-first-page-number
The page breaking algorithm is affected by the first page number being
odd or ev
Hi all,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I think this is useful material. I would put it in the CG: a new section in
> Programming work: Tutorial on grob alignment.
Maybe.
> If you do this and are
> certain make doc runs without a problem, then pushing directly to staging
first-page-number = #x , where x is the desired number works under 2.17.
Shane
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 25/03/13 05:03, i...@soundand.com wrote:
>
> Hi-
> I'm using version 2.14 to complete a large project.
>
> Looks like from manual that in \paper block I should
On 25/03/13 05:03, i...@soundand.com wrote:
Hi-
I'm using version 2.14 to complete a large project.
Looks like from manual that in \paper block I should be able to change
the
page numbering with something like
first-page-number
But so far I've failed to get anything to happen.
So perhaps i
2013/3/20 Jérôme Plût :
> Decimo tertio Kalendas Apriles MMXIII scripsit Thomas Morley :
>> Though, I didn't manage to code "(1/3)" for consecutive bookparts,
>> because I didn't understand how to get or calculate the
>> bookpart-last-page-number.
>
> The simplest way to do it would be the TeX way
i...@soundand.com writes:
> Hi-
> I'm using version 2.14 to complete a large project.
>
> Looks like from manual that in \paper block I should be able to change
> the
> page numbering with something like
>
> first-page-number
>
> But so far I've failed to get anything to happen.
So what did you
Hi-
I'm using version 2.14 to complete a large project.
Looks like from manual that in \paper block I should be able to change
the
page numbering with something like
first-page-number
But so far I've failed to get anything to happen.
So perhaps it's a # set something?
Thanks
Jay
___
Tim McNamara wrote Sunday, March 24, 2013 4:38 PM
> On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:13 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> That would probably work. And maybe we should start the "Sponsoring"
>> page with a "This might not be as easy as expected. Read on." warning.
>
>
> LOL That would also be apropos
On 24/03/13 16:13, David Kastrup wrote:
Marek Klein writes:
Hello,
what about having "Donate" button which would simply link to
Sponsoring page?
That would probably work. And maybe we should start the "Sponsoring"
page with a "This might not be as easy as expected. Read on." warning.
On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:13 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Marek Klein writes:
>
>> Hello,
>> what about having "Donate" button which would simply link to
>> Sponsoring page?
>
> That would probably work. And maybe we should start the "Sponsoring"
> page with a "This might not be as easy as expected.
Hi all
I installed Lilypond yesterday on my Windows-computer and I'm learning a
lot :-)
Since my favorite editor is the emacs I copied the files from
usr\share\emacs\site-lisp to the corresponding emacs directory.
Compiling a file with control-c control-c works fine.
Since the viewing command r
Marek Klein writes:
> Hello,
> what about having "Donate" button which would simply link to
> Sponsoring page?
That would probably work. And maybe we should start the "Sponsoring"
page with a "This might not be as easy as expected. Read on." warning.
--
David Kastrup
__
Hello,
what about having "Donate" button which would simply link to Sponsoring
page?
Marek
http://gregoriana.sk
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Mar 24, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Alberto Simões wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
>> my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
>> somewhat more to substantially more than the
Alberto Simões writes:
> Hi
>
> On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
>> my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
>> somewhat more to substantially more than the "Finale tax" would entail.
>
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Alberto Simões
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
>> my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
>> somewhat more to substantially more t
Hi
On 24/03/13 14:55, David Kastrup wrote:
Well, I am somewhat unhappy with that focus on the pricing of Finale as
my own work is being funded by LilyPond users who are typically paying
somewhat more to substantially more than the "Finale tax" would entail.
For them, the important difference ob
James Harkins writes:
> So, today I adapted a scheme function for my own use (which I had
> never done before), and it worked. Then I needed slashes for some
> normal (non-grace) notes and found:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00579.html
>
> Last week, I got a mess
So, today I adapted a scheme function for my own use (which I had
never done before), and it worked. Then I needed slashes for some
normal (non-grace) notes and found:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-12/msg00579.html
Last week, I got a message inviting me to pay my Finale tax
Op 20-03-13 15:54, James Harkins schreef:
The proposal is:
- Old: R2 == a full measure rest in 2/4 time
- New: R2 ==*two* full measure rests in any time signature
I don't like it, because the real duration is not visible anymore,
because it depends on some hidden information that is only av
Thomas Morley wrote Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:02 AM
> There are some opinions not to add it to the LM or the NR and I fully
> agree with them.
> But I strongly object to put it in the CG for one reason: The CG is
> _never_ translated!
This is a valid point.
> The Extending Manual seems to be app
On 24/03/13 10:17, Eluze wrote:
\override Staff.KeyCancellation #'break-visibility = #all-invisible
Yay. Yep, was the missing one. Thank you, Eluze.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypon
Le 23/03/2013 18:13, Trevor Daniels disait :
Noeck wrote Saturday, March 23, 2013 5:55 PM
This is explained very concisely and without examples in the NR, see
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/aligning-objects
I disagree. As an average user, I feel quite lost in this s
there is also
\override Staff.KeyCancellation.break-visibility = #all-invisible
or in older versions:
\override Staff.KeyCancellation #'break-visibility = #all-invisible
hope that's the missing one!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Removing-time-
Hello
Still 2.14 here. Need to update.
Nevertheless,
This pair seems to work:
\set Staff.explicitKeySignatureVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'break-visibility = #end-of-line-invisible
*BUT* I wasn't able to remove the key cancelation. But I think I found
On 24/03/13 09:51, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 24/03/13 09:46, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hello
Still 2.14 here. Need to update.
Nevertheless,
This pair seems to work:
\set Staff.explicitKeySignatureVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'break-visibility =
#end-
On 24/03/13 09:46, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hello
Still 2.14 here. Need to update.
Nevertheless,
This pair seems to work:
\set Staff.explicitKeySignatureVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'break-visibility =
#end-of-line-invisible
*BUT* I wasn't able to re
py2app seems quite difficult to setup on a mac. I tried pyinstaller, but
that's for now beyond my capabilites.
Perhaps someone with more Python knowledge could try to build a mac binary
using that way.
Philippe
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Frescobaldi
Anthonys Lists writes:
> On 13/03/2013 19:24, nothingwaver...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Here's the idea.
>>
>> 1. Define absolute octave syntax with the @-sign (let it be a
>> mnemonic for _A_bsolute) to be the syntax for temporarily specifying
>> an ABSOLUTE PITCH within a \relative block, such that t
34 matches
Mail list logo
