Hello!
LilyPond produces EPS files with sizes
1MB (ba_001_1_07.eps) and
20MB (ba_001_1_05.eps)
[the files are in the zip: http://nikolay.kirov.be/2013/ba_001.zip]
using very similar source codes:
ba_001_1_07.ly and
ba_001_1_05.ly
>lilypond -dbackend=eps -o
GNU LilyPond 2.14.2
Is there any e
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> trying to write a function to construct and mix/remix some music via
> `make-sequential-music' I noticed the following boiled down problem.
>
> The \xyz-function below should return a whole note for { b }
Why?
> %
>
> \version "2.14.2"
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
>> More generally than that, I think the reason to discuss is to _discover_ the
>> areas where you can cooperate. There are obvious areas of interaction --
>> e.g. enabling Lilyp
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 02/08/12 14:49, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>> If you guys can get a Google Grant for your LilyPond non-profit in the
>> Netherlands, now would be a fantastic time to run ads on Google getting
>> Sibelius users to check out L
Hi,
trying to write a function to construct and mix/remix some music via
`make-sequential-music' I noticed the following boiled down problem.
The \xyz-function below should return a whole note for { b }
%
\version "2.14.2"
\version "2.15.43"
xyz =
#(define-music-fun
On Aug 5, 2012, at 10:23 AM, Warren Cohen wrote:
> I have a rather interesting problem. I need to turn a lilypond file into a
> Sibelius file. It seems that lilypond is not XML compatible, but is there a
> way to convert it that would make it easier and more accurate than converting
> a PDF f
Concerning the examples in the manual, section 4.4.2:
4.4.2 Explicit staff and system positioning
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/explicit-staff-and-system-positioning
I don't understand the reason that the variables that
override default spacing between systems:
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 5 août 2012, at 12:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/12 17:51, Graham Percival wrote:
>>> In short: if there is a concerted effort to create a "quick
>>> render" output, I would be absolutely shocked if it wasn't at
>>> least 10 times faster t
Unfortunately there is no way to accomplish what you want ATM.
There has been some (or even much) discussion about implementing a
MusicXML export that doesn't contain all the layout but rather the
musical information. But AFAICS that's far from becoming a reality.
HTH
Urs
Am 05.08.2012 16:23,
On 5 août 2012, at 12:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 02/08/12 17:51, Graham Percival wrote:
>> In short: if there is a concerted effort to create a "quick
>> render" output, I would be absolutely shocked if it wasn't at
>> least 10 times faster than the current output.
>
> (1) How para
I have a rather interesting problem. I need to turn a lilypond file into a
Sibelius file. It seems that lilypond is not XML compatible, but is there
a way to convert it that would make it easier and more accurate than
converting a PDF file?
Thanks for letting me know
Warren Cohen
___
I have to do an arrangement of a piece that is in a lilypond file
and I need to do the arrangement in Sibelius. Is there some way for
Sibelius to read lilypond the way that it can read a Finale file?
I don't think it could be XML compatible,
but I would hope it would easier than reading a PDF.
On 02/08/12 17:51, Graham Percival wrote:
In short: if there is a concerted effort to create a "quick
render" output, I would be absolutely shocked if it wasn't at
least 10 times faster than the current output.
(1) How paralellized is the current code -- and if not much or at all, what do
you
Thank you.
Blessing in+,
Ming.
>
> From: Trevor Daniels
>To: MING TSANG ; Andrew Hawryluk
>Cc: lilypond-usermailinglist
>Sent: Sunday, August 5, 2012 3:02:38 AM
>Subject: Re: bracket notehead
>
>
>MING TSANG wrote Saturday, August 04, 2012 11:47 PM
>
>> I
George_ wrote:
>
>
> Nothing's changed - was this supposed to fix my problem?
>
>
sorry, I should have emphasized my changes - in short I have added
indent = 0 in the \layout
and
\vcenter before the \score
this should help!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.co
Thanks for the reply!
-Eluze wrote:
>
> please try to structure your code - the machine can read this code, but
> for humans this is very hard (and the result of the compilation doesn't
> change if it's written on one or more line(s) !
Sorry, I thought markups all had to be one line...
it cou
George_ wrote:
>
> I'm writing a work that has both scores and text, as well as music
> embedded within the text. For part of this, I want to put in notes
> without a staff, clef, or time signature, like so:
>
> I've attached what it looks like at the moment.
>
> I was wondering it I could m
MING TSANG wrote Saturday, August 04, 2012 11:47 PM
> I search lilypond snippet repository with "bracket" and didn't any.
> Thank you for showing me to search with "parentheses".
I've added "brackets" as an index entry pointing to the section
on parentheses.
Thanks for pointing this out, Ming.
I'm writing a work that has both scores and text, as well as music
embedded within the text. For part of this, I want to put in notes
without a staff, clef, or time signature, like so:
\markuplines {
\vspace #2
\justifiedlines
{ ...[text]...semiquavers and demisemiquavers are to be play
19 matches
Mail list logo
