I'd like to remove the initial Bar line that spans a two-staff ChoirStaff.
How is this accomplished?
Best i could come up with was:
\override ChoirStaff.SpanBar #'transparent = ##t, but no luck.
Thx, Javier___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
Am 22.05.2012 01:49, schrieb Jonghyun Kim:
Dear List,
How to do the "\autochange" between the "treble^8" and treble?
Default setting is treble and bass Clefs, but I want to modify that.
I want to display that: (download link)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8142442/lilypond-user%40gnu.org/between%20
Never before in the history of The LilyPond Report so many new editors
appeared in so short a time! This month Pavel Roskin joins us to tell
a story of wit and patience about a brave contributor who sets out on
a quest to find the cause of strange LilyPond errors appearing out of
nowhere.
In othe
John David Duncan-3 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an example where 2.15.38 does a worse job than 2.14.2 at
> placing a TupletNumber.
>
> I suspect it's related to a forced \stemUp, because the number might
> be in the right place if the stem were going down.
>
> How should I submit my example
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Urs Liska wrote:
> What I will have to see in action before really being able to believe it
> works in 'real life' is the merging of text files that have been changed by
> more than one person. Of course it's clear that it _must_ work (everything
> what I might ha
Dear Susan,
thank you very much for taking so much of your valuable time.
It's astonishing - like reading a good book, but one written with my
specific questions in mind :-)
Well basically everything really is very much what I had expected it to be.
What I will have to see in action before re
Thank you very much!
Seems to work perfectly (so far - until we find something new ;-) )
Best
Urs
Am 22.05.2012 17:28, schrieb David Nalesnik:
Hi again,
The problem happens when the variable "function" attempts to look
up the procedure for 'control-points. Each override you do is
On 05/22/2012 04:57 PM, Choan Gálvez wrote:
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011
Hi again,
The problem happens when the variable "function" attempts to look up the
> procedure for 'control-points. Each override you do is tacked onto the
> front of the alist and so the key we're looking for-- 'control-points -- is
> pushed further back. You can see what I mean by changing cdr
On 05/22/2012 04:57 PM, Choan Gálvez wrote:
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011
Hi,
I have an example where 2.15.38 does a worse job than 2.14.2 at
placing a TupletNumber.
I suspect it's related to a forced \stemUp, because the number might
be in the right place if the stem were going down.
How should I submit my example ... in email here? In an issue reporter?
Tha
On 5/22/12 16:53 , rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by 'stat
On 05/22/2012 12:47 AM, lilyp...@umpquanet.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:51:25PM +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00285.html
What do you mean by 'status'? It works for me. I've tweaked the
mark
Hi Urs,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
> Hi David N,
>
> Recently we experienced strange crashes in our Lilypond scores that could
> only be avoided by randomly changing the order of some function calls.
>
> Now I sat down and pinned it down quite narrowly:
> If I use your won
Hi David N,
Recently we experienced strange crashes in our Lilypond scores that could only
be avoided by randomly changing the order of some function calls.
Now I sat down and pinned it down quite narrowly:
If I use your wonderful \shape function and afterwards override any property of
the same
Hi again,
> I'm attaching a revised version which works with 2.15.38 which you'll want
> to use instead. (It won't work with 2.14.2.) It's somewhat simplified.
> One thing that you can do with it is change the distance of the number
> from the beam by overriding TupletBracket #'padding (yes, b
> If we'd use the 'build token' concept (be it through empty emails or
> 'lock files') then we're basically where we are right now (with a shared
> folder): tell the others which file I'm going to edit and ask them to
> leave this alone for a while.
It looks similar, but there are big differenc
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>
> thanks for your patience. I somehow start to see some light ;-)
Good!
> Am 22.05.2012 10:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
> >On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> > > Do I understand correctly that what you describe is
Hi Colin,
thanks for your patience. I somehow start to see some light ;-)
Am 22.05.2012 10:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Dear Susan,
I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
Colin wanted to express ...).
It was
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Dear Susan,
>
> I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
> Colin wanted to express ...).
It was pretty close. Thanks, Susan, you write well.
> Do I understand correctly that what you describe is one possibl
Hi Urs,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:42:14AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 22.05.2012 00:53, schrieb Colin Hall:
> >On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:13:54PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >>In the meantime I had already decided to go this way for the next
> >>projects. Our current project that we organize with
Dear Susan,
I think this makes sense (although I can't tell if it really is what
Colin wanted to express ...).
Do I understand correctly that what you describe is one possible
strategy to take care of the integrity of the main source tree?
And another one would be what I have the impression i
Dear Urs,
I think what Colin meant by "build token" is another strategy to archieve
the same as what I described with "checkin/merge to the main branch" and
"personal development branches". I think he has in mind a decentralized
version control tool, where you first work with your local version,
c
23 matches
Mail list logo
